top of page

Explain the consequences of the Great Leap Forward in China between 1958 and 1965.

Level

GCSE

Year Examined

2021

Topic

China

👑Complete Model Essay

Explain the consequences of the Great Leap Forward in China between 1958 and 1965.

Essay Outline: The Consequences of the Great Leap Forward in China (1958-1965)
Launched in 1958, the Great Leap Forward was Chairman Mao Zedong's ambitious campaign to rapidly transform China from an agrarian society into a modern, industrialized communist power. Aiming to surpass the West, Mao implemented drastic policies of agricultural collectivization and rapid industrialization. However, the consequences of this "leap" were disastrous, leading to widespread famine, political upheaval, and long-term damage to China's development.

Consequence 1: The Great Chinese Famine (1959-1961)
One of the most horrific consequences of the Great Leap Forward was the Great Chinese Famine, which ravaged China between 1959 and 1961. Several factors contributed to this catastrophe, all stemming from the campaign's flawed agricultural policies.
- Lysenko's Flawed Agricultural Theories: Mao's embrace of Trofim Lysenko's pseudoscientific agricultural theories proved disastrous. Lysenko, favored by Stalin in the Soviet Union, rejected Mendelian genetics in favor of methods that lacked scientific basis. His techniques, implemented despite opposition from Chinese scientists, led to significant drops in crop yields.
- The "Four Pests" Campaign and Ecological Disaster: The "Four Pests" campaign, launched in 1958, aimed to eliminate mosquitoes, rats, flies, and sparrows. The extermination of sparrows, considered pests for consuming grain, proved particularly damaging. With their natural predator gone, insect populations exploded, devastating crops and further exacerbating food shortages. This ecological imbalance highlighted the regime's disregard for scientific expertise.
- Widespread Famine and Devastating Death Toll: The combined effect of misguided agricultural policies, ecological disaster, and state procurement practices led to a catastrophic famine. Between 1959 and 1961, an estimated 30 to 45 million people perished from starvation, marking one of the deadliest famines in human history. The Great Leap Forward's impact on China's population was profound and remains a stark reminder of the human cost of failed utopian policies.

Consequence 2: Damage to Mao's Authority and Political Shifts
The Great Leap Forward's devastating failure had significant political ramifications, shaking Mao's authority and triggering shifts within the Communist Party.
- Growing Criticism and Mao's Responsibility: The famine and economic turmoil led to growing criticism of Mao's leadership. Within the Communist Party, figures like Peng Dehuai, the Minister of Defence, bravely voiced opposition to the Great Leap Forward's policies. However, Mao, unwilling to accept full responsibility, labelled critics as "right opportunists" and purged them in the Anti-Rightist Campaign. Peng Dehuai was removed from his position and suffered persecution.
- The 7000 Cadre Conference and Mao's Partial Retreat: In 1962, the severity of the crisis forced Mao to convene the 7000 Cadre Conference. In a rare moment of self-criticism, he acknowledged "mistakes" in the Great Leap Forward, though he largely blamed them on poor implementation and bad weather rather than the policies themselves. This partial admission led to a temporary retreat from radical economic policies.
- Rise of Pragmatists: The Great Leap Forward's failure created space for more pragmatic leaders within the Party. Liu Shaoqi, who had earlier criticized the communes, gained influence, and Deng Xiaoping, along with other pragmatists, began to implement economic reforms. These reforms involved dismantling communes and reintroducing some market mechanisms in agriculture. This shift towards pragmatism, however, would be short-lived, as Mao, fearing a loss of his authority and socialist ideals, would soon launch the Cultural Revolution.

Conclusion:
The Great Leap Forward stands as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of utopian policies implemented without regard for human cost or practical realities. The famine that resulted from its flawed policies resulted in the deaths of millions, leaving a deep scar on China's social fabric. Moreover, the Great Leap Forward's impact extended beyond the immediate crisis, leading to political upheaval, shifts in power dynamics within the Communist Party, and a lasting legacy of fear and repression. While it aimed for rapid progress, it ultimately set China back years in its development and sowed the seeds for further turmoil in the Cultural Revolution to come.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Essay Outline: The Consequences of the Great Leap Forward in China (1958-1965)

Introduction:
Briefly introduce the Great Leap Forward, Mao Zedong's ambitions for rapid industrialization and agricultural collectivization, and hint at its disastrous consequences.

Consequence 1: The Great Chinese Famine (1959-1961)
- Lysenko's Flawed Agricultural Theories: Explain how Mao's adoption of Trofim Lysenko's pseudoscientific agricultural methods, despite opposition from Chinese scientists, led to crop failures.
- The "Four Pests" Campaign and Ecological Disaster: Detail the disastrous consequences of the "Four Pests" campaign, particularly the "Sparrowcide" drive. Explain how the elimination of sparrows led to an explosion in pest populations and further decimated agricultural yields.
- Widespread Famine and Devastating Death Toll: Describe the horrific scale of the famine, emphasizing the millions of deaths it caused. Highlight the human cost of the Great Leap Forward's failures.

Consequence 2: Damage to Mao's Authority and Political Shifts
- Growing Criticism and Mao's Responsibility: Explain how the failures of the Great Leap Forward led to growing criticism of Mao's leadership, both within the Party and among the populace. Highlight the role of figures like Peng Dehuai who dared to challenge Mao.
- The 7000 Cadre Conference and Mao's Partial Retreat: Discuss the significance of the 7000 Cadre Conference in 1962. Explain how Mao admitted some mistakes (though blamed others) and temporarily stepped back from economic management.
- Rise of Pragmatists: Explain how this period saw the rise of more pragmatic leaders like Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping who began to implement economic reforms and dismantle some of the communes.

Conclusion:
- Summarize the devastating consequences of the Great Leap Forward, emphasizing both the human cost of the famine and the lasting impact on China's political landscape.
- Offer a final thought on the significance of the Great Leap Forward in understanding Mao's rule and China's subsequent development.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

One consequence of the Great Leap Forward was that it led to famine in China.
Mao encouraged the Chinese peasants to follow the agricultural policies of Trofim Lysekno and launched campaigns like the ‘Four Noes’ but these proved to be a disaster. Lysenko’s methods resulted in a shortage of crops, and the policy of ‘sparrowcide’ led to a growth of pests that ate many of the crops that were actually grown. This had terrible consequences because famine swept the country, and millions had died by the early 1960s.
Another consequence of the Great Leap Forward was that it led to Mao being discredited.
He had been responsible for the policy and continued with it even after it was clear it was a failure. He had purged other Communist leaders like Peng Dehaui who criticised the Leap. When all the failures become clear, Mao had to assume much of the blame, criticised himself at the 7000 Cadre conference of 1962, and resigned from one of his key Party positions.
The consequence this had in China is that it led to Deng Xiaoping and Liu Shaoqi taking control of China’s economy and dismantling many of Mao’s communes.

bottom of page