Which of the following played a more significant role in the collapse of Apartheid? i. PW Botha ii. FW de Klerk Explain your answer with reference to both (i) and (ii).
Level
A Level
Year Examined
2021
Topic
Apartheid and Reconciliation: South African Politics 1948-1999
👑Complete Model Essay
Which of the following played a more significant role in the collapse of Apartheid? i. PW Botha ii. FW de Klerk Explain your answer with reference to both (i) and (ii).
The Role of PW Botha and FW de Klerk in the Collapse of Apartheid
The dismantling of apartheid in South Africa was a complex and multifaceted process, with numerous contributing factors. While both PW Botha and FW de Klerk held significant positions of power during this period, their roles in the eventual collapse of apartheid were vastly different. This essay will argue that while PW Botha's policies ultimately contributed to the system's demise, it was FW de Klerk's decisive actions and commitment to dismantling apartheid that proved more significant in its downfall.
PW Botha’s Legacy of Resistance and Division
PW Botha's premiership was characterized by his attempts to reform apartheid through a policy known as the "Total Strategy". This approach aimed to maintain white minority rule while attempting to quell the growing internal and external resistance to the regime. However, the Total Strategy ultimately proved ineffective. The brutal suppression of anti-apartheid movements, including the Sharpeville Massacre and the Soweto Uprising, only further fueled resistance and galvanized international condemnation.
Furthermore, Botha's policies generated significant internal divisions within the white community and the National Party. While some saw the need for limited reform, many clung to the rigid structures of apartheid. This internal conflict weakened the government's resolve and created a climate of uncertainty within the white electorate.
Botha's attempts at reform were often seen as cosmetic and intended to prolong the reign of the National Party, rather than usher in genuine change. These reforms ultimately failed to address the fundamental injustices of the apartheid system and instead fueled growing discontent within the black community. By attempting to retain the power structures of apartheid, Botha inadvertently created a climate ripe for its collapse.
FW de Klerk: Catalyst for Change and Negotiation
In contrast to Botha's hardline approach, FW de Klerk adopted a significantly different approach upon assuming the presidency in 1989. De Klerk understood that the apartheid system was unsustainable and recognized the need for radical change. He embarked on a series of bold actions aimed at dismantling apartheid, including the unbanning of the African National Congress (ANC) and other anti-apartheid organizations, and the release of Nelson Mandela and other political prisoners.
De Klerk also initiated a process of negotiation with the ANC and other political groups, leading to the drafting of a new constitution that promised a non-racial democratic South Africa. This commitment to negotiation and the dismantling of apartheid structures was a significant departure from the policies of his predecessor and paved the way for a peaceful transition to democracy.
It is crucial to acknowledge that the situation de Klerk inherited was already precarious. The international sanctions imposed on South Africa, the escalation of armed resistance, and the growing domestic unrest had significantly weakened the apartheid regime. However, de Klerk's willingness to engage in meaningful dialogue and dismantle the system's core structures was essential in preventing further violence and paving the way for a negotiated settlement.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while PW Botha's policies contributed to the eventual collapse of apartheid by fueling resistance and exposing the system's weaknesses, it was FW de Klerk's decisive actions and commitment to dismantling apartheid that played a more significant role in its downfall. De Klerk's willingness to negotiate with the ANC, unban political organizations, release political prisoners, and move towards a new constitution marked a turning point in South Africa's history. His actions ushered in a new era of democracy and equality, transforming South Africa from a pariah state to a beacon of hope for a more just and equitable world.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Thesis Statement: While P.W. Botha's policies inadvertently contributed to the weakening of Apartheid, it was ultimately F.W. de Klerk's decisive actions and willingness to dismantle the system that played the more significant role in its collapse.
P.W. Botha and the Failures of Reform
Total Strategy and its Consequences
Discuss Botha's attempts to reform Apartheid through the Total Strategy. Explain how this policy, aimed at strengthening Apartheid, ultimately backfired by:
⭐Fueling internal resistance and international condemnation.
⭐Exacerbating economic instability due to sanctions.
⭐Highlighting the contradictions inherent within Apartheid.
Growing Opposition and Divisions within White South Africa
Explain how Botha's policies, rather than placating the situation, led to:
⭐Increased militancy from groups like the ANC.
⭐Growing dissent even within the white community.
⭐Divisions within the National Party itself, weakening its grip on power.
F.W. de Klerk and the Dismantling of Apartheid
Decisive Action: Unbanning and Release of Political Prisoners
Highlight the significance of de Klerk's decision to:
⭐Unban the ANC and other political parties.
⭐Release key political figures like Nelson Mandela.
Explain how these actions demonstrated a commitment to dismantling Apartheid, unlike Botha's attempts at reform.
Negotiations and the Path to a New Constitution
Discuss de Klerk's willingness to:
⭐Engage in negotiations with the ANC and other black leaders.
⭐Work towards a new constitution that would grant equal rights to all South Africans.
Emphasize how this marked a fundamental shift from the previous regime's stance.
Inheriting a Crisis: Was Apartheid Already Collapsing?
Address the argument that de Klerk inherited an untenable situation. Acknowledge the role of:
⭐Internal unrest and international pressure.
⭐The failing economy and unsustainable system.
However, emphasize that de Klerk's choices and actions were still crucial in navigating the transition and dismantling Apartheid.
Conclusion
Restate the thesis: While Botha's policies inadvertently weakened the Apartheid regime, it was de Klerk's decisive steps towards dismantling the system that ultimately led to its collapse. While de Klerk inherited a volatile situation, his willingness to negotiate and make significant concessions ultimately proved to be the decisive factor in ending Apartheid in South Africa.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Dealing with Botha
Answers might consider the failures of his Total Strategy policy to reform Apartheid and stabilise the system. Answers might consider the significant increase in opposition during his tenure. Answers might consider the divisions which resulted from his policies within the white community and National Party.
Dealing with de Klerk
Answers might consider the significance of the unbanning of political parties and the release of political prisoners. Answers might consider the importance of the decision to move towards a new constitution, in consultation with all political groups. Answers might consider the situation inherited by de Klerk and whether Apartheid was already collapsing.