Explain why the New Deal faced criticism by some on the liberal left.
Level
AS LEVEL
Year Examined
2021
Topic
The Great Crash, the Great Depression and the New Deal policies, 1920–41
👑Complete Model Essay
Explain why the New Deal faced criticism by some on the liberal left.
Criticisms of the New Deal from the Left
While the New Deal implemented by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) from 1933 onwards was undoubtedly a significant program of government intervention in the US economy, it faced criticism from various quarters. A key source of opposition came from left-wing liberals who argued that the New Deal did not go far enough in addressing the fundamental inequalities within American society. This essay will examine the validity of these criticisms, exploring the arguments made by figures like Huey Long and Dr. Francis Townsend, and analyzing the extent to which the New Deal represented a missed opportunity for radical change.
Arguments for More Radical Change
Many left-wing critics viewed the New Deal as a series of pragmatic measures designed to stabilize the economy rather than a genuine attempt to challenge the existing power structures. They pointed to the fact that many New Deal programs, such as the National Recovery Administration (NRA), involved collaboration with big businesses. The NRA, for example, allowed businesses to set their own codes of fair competition, which critics argued merely strengthened the position of large corporations. These critics believed that FDR, despite his rhetoric of helping the "forgotten man," was too willing to compromise with the wealthy and powerful, ultimately preserving the status quo of economic inequality.
Huey Long, the fiery senator from Louisiana, emerged as the most prominent voice of this discontent. His "Share Our Wealth" plan called for radical wealth redistribution, proposing to cap personal fortunes and use the revenue generated to guarantee a minimum income for all Americans. Long argued that the New Deal's focus on relief and recovery was insufficient and that true justice required a fundamental restructuring of the American economic system. While his proposals gained considerable support, particularly in the South, Long's assassination in 1935 effectively silenced this potent opposition to the New Deal's perceived limitations.
Dr. Francis Townsend, a retired physician, offered another strand of left-wing criticism, focusing on the New Deal's shortcomings in addressing the needs of the elderly. Townsend proposed the "Old Age Revolving Pension Plan," which would provide a monthly pension to all citizens over the age of 60 on the condition that they spend it within the month. This, he argued, would not only alleviate poverty among the elderly but also stimulate the economy through increased consumer spending. While Townsend's plan was not adopted in its entirety, it undoubtedly contributed to the pressure on FDR to address the plight of older Americans, ultimately leading to the establishment of Social Security in 1935.
The New Deal: A Missed Opportunity?
The criticisms leveled by Long, Townsend, and other left-wing figures raise important questions about the legacy of the New Deal. While the New Deal undeniably provided crucial relief during a time of unprecedented economic hardship and introduced significant reforms such as Social Security, it can be argued that it fell short of its revolutionary potential by failing to fundamentally challenge the structures of economic inequality.
It is important to note, however, that FDR faced a complex and challenging political landscape. He had to navigate opposition not only from the left but also from conservative forces deeply opposed to government intervention in the economy. In this context, the New Deal can be seen as a pragmatic approach, balancing the need for immediate relief with the goal of long-term reform.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the New Deal represented a significant expansion of the role of the federal government in American life, it was subject to valid criticisms from the left. Figures like Huey Long and Dr. Francis Townsend argued that FDR's programs did not go far enough in addressing the root causes of economic inequality and failed to adequately provide for vulnerable groups like the elderly. While the New Deal's focus on immediate relief and its compromises with big business may have limited its transformative potential, it is crucial to consider the historical context and the political realities FDR faced. Ultimately, the New Deal remains a complex and contested legacy, demonstrating both the possibilities and the limitations of government action in addressing societal challenges.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Did the New Deal go far enough in challenging inequalities in the USA?
Introduction: Briefly introduce the New Deal and acknowledge the perspective that it did not go far enough in addressing inequalities. State your line of argument.
Arguments that the New Deal did not go far enough
Left-wing critiques: Explain the perspective of left-wing liberals who believed FDR was too conciliatory towards businesses and that the New Deal failed to fundamentally challenge inequalities.
Huey Long and "Share Our Wealth": Detail Long's criticisms and his proposal for radical wealth redistribution. Explain the significance of his assassination in 1935.
Dr. Francis Townsend and support for the elderly: Discuss Townsend's criticisms regarding the lack of support for retired people. Explain the impact of his movement and its connection to the eventual introduction of Social Security.
Arguments that the New Deal did address inequalities
First New Deal's focus on economic recovery: Acknowledge the limitations of the First New Deal (1933-35) but emphasize its necessity in reversing the economic crisis.
Second New Deal's focus on social reform: Highlight the Second New Deal's (1935-38) shift towards social justice, including the introduction of Social Security, as a response to critics like Townsend.
Other New Deal programs addressing inequality: Discuss other New Deal programs that aimed to alleviate inequalities, such as the Works Progress Administration (WPA), providing employment opportunities, and the Wagner Act, strengthening labor rights.
Conclusion
Summarize the main arguments presented. Offer a balanced conclusion on whether the New Deal went far enough in challenging inequalities, acknowledging both its limitations and achievements. Consider the long-term impact of the New Deal on social and economic structures in the USA.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Criticism of the New Deal from the Left
Many left-wing liberals simply believed that the New Deal did not go far enough and that FDR was making too many concessions to the business classes. They saw the New Deal’s policies as rejecting radical change in favour of accepting the current economic and social inequalities.
Huey Long, the Democratic Senator for Louisiana, was the best-known critic of the New Deal from the left. He wanted more federal government action to redistribute wealth from the rich to the poor, as shown by his ‘Share Our Wealth’ plan. Dr Francis Townsend, a retired doctor, also opposed the New Deal for failing to support retired people.
These criticisms applied to the First New Deal of 1933–1935, which was more concerned with reversing the US economy’s rapid decline than with promoting social justice and a more equal society. Huey Long was assassinated in 1935, effectively ending his movement, whereas FDR did introduce social security for the elderly as part of the Second New Deal.