Explain why the Estates General was not able to deal with the issues France faced.
Level
AS LEVEL
Year Examined
2021
Topic
France, 1774–1814
👑Complete Model Essay
Explain why the Estates General was not able to deal with the issues France faced.
Why the Estates General Was Unable to Deal with the Issues France Faced
The summoning of the Estates General in 1789 was intended to provide a solution to the crippling financial and social issues plaguing France. However, instead of offering solutions, the Estates General became a catalyst for the French Revolution. This essay will argue that the Estates General was inherently incapable of addressing France's problems due to procedural uncertainties, unrealistic expectations, lack of clear direction, and escalating frustrations with the monarchy, culminating in its replacement by the National Constituent Assembly.
Procedure
The Estates General, dormant since 1614, was shrouded in procedural ambiguity. With no recent precedent, confusion reigned over its operation. Disputes erupted regarding representation, with the Third Estate, representing 98% of the population, demanding proportionate representation to match their societal contribution. This contradicted the traditional voting system where each Estate held one vote, essentially giving the First and Second Estates (clergy and nobility respectively) the power to outvote the Third. This fundamental disagreement over representation paralyzed the Estates General from its inception.
Over-Optimistic
The cahiers de doléances, grievances compiled in the lead-up to the Estates General, further complicated matters. While offering a valuable insight into the problems faced by the French people, they simultaneously generated unrealistic expectations. The cahiers, filled with hopes for reform, clashed with the reality of the Estates General, an institution deeply rooted in the Ancien Régime. This institution, designed to uphold the existing social order, was ill-equipped to deliver the sweeping changes many desired.
Lack of Guidance
Adding to the turmoil was the absence of clear direction regarding the looming financial crisis. While the cahiers offered a plethora of solutions, they lacked cohesion and decisive royal guidance. This lack of a unified approach, coupled with the existing factionalism within the Estates General, hindered any attempts at finding a consensus and enacting meaningful financial reforms.
Frustration with the King
Further fueling the flames of discontent were the actions of Louis XVI. His decision to preserve the voting structure favoring the privileged estates, coupled with his perceived indifference to the plight of the Third Estate, created a sense of betrayal. This culminated in the Third Estate declaring itself the National Assembly and claiming sole authority over taxation, a direct challenge to royal power and a clear departure from the Estates General's intended purpose.
King's Bad Faith
The final nail in the coffin came with Louis XVI's perceived attempts to assert his authority through military force. The mobilization of troops around Paris, interpreted as a threat against the newly formed National Assembly, ignited the already volatile situation, ultimately culminating in the storming of the Bastille on July 14th, 1789. This event, a symbol of popular revolt against royal authority, marked the definitive end of the Estates General.
Conclusion
The Estates General, burdened by procedural confusion, unrealistic expectations, lack of direction, and escalating conflict with the monarchy, proved incapable of addressing the challenges faced by France. Instead of providing solutions, it exposed the deep-seated flaws within the Ancien Régime and fueled the revolutionary spirit that would sweep the nation. The formation of the National Constituent Assembly signified the need for entirely new institutions, free from the constraints of the past, to address the pressing issues plaguing France.
**Sources:**
Doyle, W. (2002). The Oxford History of the French Revolution. Oxford University Press.
Schama, S. (1989). Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. Vintage Books.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
The Estates General, convened in 1789 after 175 years of inactivity, ultimately failed to address the deep-seated issues plaguing France. This essay will argue that this failure stemmed from a combination of procedural confusion, unrealistic expectations, lack of clear direction, and the escalating tensions between the monarchy and the Third Estate.
Procedural Uncertainty
The long absence of the Estates General created confusion surrounding its procedures. Debates arose over voting methods (by order vs. by head) and representation, highlighting the existing inequalities between the three estates. This uncertainty hampered the body's ability to function effectively from the outset.
Unrealistic Expectations and Lack of Direction
The cahiers de doléances, while raising hopes for reform, presented a wide array of often conflicting demands. This lack of a unified vision, coupled with the absence of clear royal guidance on addressing the financial crisis, contributed to the Estates General's inability to formulate concrete solutions.
Escalating Tensions and Royal Missteps
Louis XVI's actions, perceived as favoring the privileged orders, fueled discontent within the Third Estate. The formation of the National Assembly and its claim to authority on taxation marked a turning point, signifying a direct challenge to royal power and the existing order.
The King's Bad Faith and the Collapse of Order
Louis XVI's attempts to assert his authority, particularly the deployment of troops, were met with fear and resistance, culminating in the storming of the Bastille. This event marked the effective end of the Estates General and ushered in a new phase of the Revolution, highlighting the need for entirely new political structures to address France's problems.
Conclusion
The Estates General's failure was not merely a result of its own limitations, but a symptom of the deep-rooted problems within the Ancien Régime itself. The inability to reconcile the monarchy's authority with the growing demands for reform ultimately paved the way for more radical change and the emergence of new systems of governance in France.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Why the Estates General Was Unable to Deal with the Issues France Faced:
Procedure: Uncertainty surrounded the institution due to its long absence since 1614, leading to confusion on how to proceed. Disagreements arose on representation and decision-making processes.
Over-Optimistic: Expectations were raised by the cahiers, but the Estates General, as an institution of the Ancien Régime, could not live up to the hoped-for fundamental reforms.
Lack of Guidance: Financial troubles loomed over France, but the cahiers offered conflicting solutions, lacking royal direction. This confusion seeped into early debates.
Frustration with the King: Louis XVI's actions, preserving bias against the Third Estate, fueled discontent. The National Assembly challenged royal power by rebranding itself and claiming authority on taxation, straying from the Estates General's original purpose.
King's Bad Faith: Louis XVI's perceived attempts to bolster his power with additional troops alarmed the populace. This fear, combined with the king's actions, culminated in disorder, notably the storming of the Bastille. The formation of the National Constituent Assembly marked the end of the Estates General, signaling the need for new institutions to address France's issues.
*In conclusion,the Estates General's inability to address France's challenges highlighted the necessity of new, innovative structures in governance to effectively tackle the country's pressing concerns.