Explain why the League of Nations had limited success in the 1920s.
Level
AS LEVEL
Year Examined
2022
Topic
The League of Nations and international relations in the 1920s
👑Complete Model Essay
Explain why the League of Nations had limited success in the 1920s.
The League of Nations: Limited Success in the 1920s
The League of Nations, established in 1920, emerged from the ashes of World War I with the noble ambition of preventing future conflicts. While it achieved some successes in international cooperation, its structural weaknesses ultimately limited its effectiveness. This essay will argue that the League's failure to prevent aggression in the 1920s stemmed from its image as a "victor's club," its lack of enforcement power, the absence of key nations like the United States, and the requirement for unanimous decision-making.
Perceived as a "Victor's Club"
The League suffered from the outset from its association with the Treaty of Versailles. The defeated powers were initially excluded, with Austria, Hungary, and Germany only gaining admittance in subsequent years. This exclusion fueled resentment and undermined the League's claim to impartial peacekeeping. The very treaty that created the League was seen by many as a dictated peace, further hindering its legitimacy. As historian Margaret MacMillan argues, "The League was tainted by its association with the Treaty of Versailles" (MacMillan, <i>Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World</i>, 2002).
Lack of Enforcement Power
A critical flaw in the League's structure was its lack of independent military force. It relied on member states to provide troops for peacekeeping operations, which often proved unreliable. The 1920 invasion of Lithuania by Poland highlighted this weakness. Despite condemning the action, the League was powerless to intervene militarily. This case demonstrated that without a dedicated force, its ability to enforce its decisions remained severely limited.
Absence of Key Powers: The Case of the United States
The absence of the United States, a key proponent of the League's formation, dealt a significant blow to its credibility and influence. The US Senate, wary of entanglement in European affairs, refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, effectively preventing the US from joining the League. This deprived the organization of a major economic and military power, undermining its ability to act decisively on the world stage.
The Unanimity Rule: A Recipe for Inaction
The League's insistence on unanimous decision-making among its members created a significant obstacle to effective action. Even on relatively minor issues, securing agreement from all members proved difficult, often leading to inaction or watered-down resolutions. The 1935 Abyssinian Crisis, where Italy invaded Ethiopia, exemplified this problem. Although the League condemned Italy's actions, the lack of a united front and the reluctance to impose meaningful sanctions allowed Mussolini to succeed. The unanimity rule effectively paralyzed the League in the face of determined aggression.
Conclusion
While the League of Nations represented a significant step toward international cooperation, its structural limitations ultimately hindered its ability to fulfill its mandate of preventing war. Perceived as a tool of the victors, lacking enforcement power, weakened by the absence of key nations, and hampered by its own procedures, the League struggled to address the growing challenges to peace in the 1920s. Its failures served as a stark reminder of the complexities of international relations and the difficulty of achieving lasting peace in a world still recovering from a devastating war.
Note: History Study Pack Required
Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!
Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...
History Study Pack.
✅ 1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.
✅ Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.
🍃 Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the League of Nations and its aims. State that while it had some early successes, ultimately it had limited success in the 1920s. Briefly mention the key reasons for this: structural weaknesses, lack of enforcement power, and lack of US participation.
Structural Weaknesses
Discuss how the League's structure hindered its effectiveness:
⭐"Victors' Club": Explain how the exclusion of defeated powers initially created resentment and hindered reconciliation.
⭐Tie to Versailles Treaty: Explain how the League's association with the unpopular treaty damaged its reputation, particularly among defeated nations.
⭐Unanimity Rule: Discuss how requiring unanimous decisions made it difficult to take action and encouraged inaction.
Lack of Enforcement Power
Explain how the League's lack of military power undermined its authority:
⭐No standing army: Highlight the League's reliance on member states to contribute forces, which was often unreliable.
⭐Case Studies: Provide specific examples like the Japanese invasion of Manchuria or the Italian invasion of Ethiopia to demonstrate the League's inability to enforce its decisions.
Absence of the United States
Analyze the impact of the US refusal to join the League:
⭐Loss of legitimacy: Explain how the absence of the nation that spearheaded the League's creation damaged its credibility and influence.
⭐Economic and political void: Discuss how the lack of US involvement weakened the League economically and politically, making it less able to exert pressure on aggressor nations.
Conclusion
Reiterate that the League's limited success in the 1920s was primarily due to its structural weaknesses, lack of enforcement power, and the absence of the United States. Briefly mention that while the League laid the groundwork for future international cooperation, its failures ultimately contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
Extracts from Mark Schemes
Explain why the League of Nations had limited success in the 1920s.
The answer to this question is expected to focus on the intrinsic structural weaknesses of the League:
⭐It was initially seen as a ‘club’ for the victors – the defeated powers were only slowly admitted. (Austria was allowed to join in 1920, Hungary in 1922 and Germany in 1926, but Turkey and the USSR were not admitted until the 1930s).
⭐It was an integral part of the Treaty of Versailles which increased its unpopularity with the defeated nations.
⭐USA never joined. This denied the League access to American political, economic and military influence. The League came about through American diplomacy, so its absence raised questions about the League’s legitimacy.
⭐It did not have any powers to enforce its decisions, e.g., Polish invasion of Lithuania. Mussolini/Corfu incident.
⭐All decisions had to be unanimous. If this was not achieved, then nothing could be done.
Accept any other valid responses.