top of page

Explain why the Compromise of 1877 was agreed.

Level

AS LEVEL

Year Examined

2021

Topic

Civil War and Reconstruction, 1861–77

👑Complete Model Essay

Explain why the Compromise of 1877 was agreed.

The Compromise of 1877: An Agreement Born of Exhaustion

The Compromise of 1877, an informal agreement reached in February of that year, marked a pivotal moment in American history. It effectively ended Reconstruction, the ambitious project intended to integrate the defeated Confederate states back into the Union and secure civil rights for freed slaves. While often portrayed as a singular event, the Compromise was a culmination of various factors that had brought the nation to a political and social impasse after the contentious 1876 presidential election. This essay will argue that the Compromise was ultimately agreed upon due to the exhaustion and shifting priorities of both the North and the South.

A Nation Divided: The Election of 1876 and its Aftermath

The 1876 presidential election, with Republican Rutherford B. Hayes facing off against Democrat Samuel Tilden, laid bare the deep divisions that still plagued the nation. Tilden won the popular vote and held a narrow lead in the Electoral College. However, the outcome hinged on twenty disputed electoral votes from Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina – states still grappling with the legacy of slavery and Reconstruction. An Electoral Commission, established to resolve the crisis, awarded all twenty votes to Hayes in a controversial decision widely seen as partisan. The nation teetered on the brink, with the specter of renewed conflict looming large.

This political deadlock unfolded against a backdrop of social and economic turmoil. The Panic of 1873 had plunged the nation into a severe economic depression, diverting attention and resources away from Reconstruction efforts. Northern support for the project, once steadfast, began to waver. As historian Eric Foner notes, "The North’s commitment to Reconstruction had always been tenuous, dependent on a combination of idealism and self-interest." (Foner, Eric. <i>Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863–1877.</i> HarperCollins, 2014.) The economic downturn, coupled with growing weariness over the "Southern Question," shifted priorities towards national recovery and economic stability.

The South's Resurgence and the Price of Compromise

Meanwhile, in the South, white Southerners chafed under Reconstruction policies, which they viewed as intrusive and punitive. The withdrawal of federal troops, a key provision of the Compromise, was seen as a victory for Southern autonomy. They yearned for a return to "home rule", free from federal intervention and oversight. The Compromise offered a pathway to achieve this, though at a steep price – the acceptance of a Republican president they viewed as illegitimate.

The Compromise, therefore, represented a convergence of interests, albeit born more out of exhaustion than genuine reconciliation. The North, weary of the financial and social costs of Reconstruction, sought a way to extricate itself from the quagmire. The South, eager to reassert its autonomy and dismantle the remnants of Reconstruction, was willing to concede the presidency in exchange for control over its own affairs.

The Legacy of Compromise: A Hollow Victory?

The Compromise of 1877, while averting a potential crisis, did little to address the underlying racial tensions and inequalities that Reconstruction had sought to rectify. By ceding control of the South to white Democrats, the Compromise effectively abandoned African Americans to a system of Jim Crow segregation and disenfranchisement that would persist for decades. The promise of equal rights, enshrined in the Reconstruction amendments, remained largely unfulfilled.

In conclusion, the Compromise of 1877 was a product of its time – a fragile agreement reached amidst political stalemate, economic uncertainty, and waning Northern resolve. It marked the end of Reconstruction, not as a resounding success, but as a testament to the challenges of forging unity and equality in the wake of a deeply divisive conflict. While peace was preserved, the nation had, in many ways, simply postponed a reckoning with the issues of race and equality that continued to cast a long shadow over American society.

Note: History Study Pack Required

 

Score Big with Perfectly Structured History Essays!

Prepare effortlessly for your A/AS/O-Level exams with our comprehensive...

 

History Study Pack.

1200+ Model Essays: Master your essay writing with expertly crafted answers to past paper questions.

Exam Boards Covered: Tailored materials for AQA, Cambridge, and OCR exams.

🍃 Free Essay Plan

Introduction
Briefly introduce the Compromise of 1877 and its significance as the end of Reconstruction. Mention the disputed election of 1876 and the impasse it created.

The Disputed Election of 1876
Explain the controversy surrounding the election results. Highlight Samuel Tilden's popular vote win and the disputed Electoral College votes. Discuss the role of the electoral commission and its partisan decision to award the votes to Rutherford Hayes.

Reasons for the Compromise
Southern Democrats' Motivation
Emphasize the South's desire to end Reconstruction. Explain how federal troops in the South, a key aspect of Reconstruction, were seen as an obstacle to white Southerners regaining control over their states and reinstituting discriminatory practices.
Republican Party's Motivation
Discuss the Republican Party's shifting priorities. Mention the economic "panic" of 1873 and the growing focus on economic recovery. Explain how the Compromise offered a way to end the political stalemate and address pressing national issues.

The Compromise and its Aftermath
Outline the terms of the Compromise. Explain the exchange: Hayes' presidency in return for the withdrawal of federal troops from the South and support for infrastructure projects. Analyze the Compromise as a symbol of the failure of Reconstruction. Highlight the continued division between the North and South, particularly in terms of political parties and racial equality.

Conclusion
Reiterate the Compromise of 1877 as a result of the disputed election and the distinct motivations of the Democrats and Republicans. Emphasize the Compromise's significance as marking the end of Reconstruction and the perpetuation of racial and political tensions in the United States.

Extracts from Mark Schemes

Why the Compromise of 1877 was Agreed

After the controversial results of the 1876 Presidential election, the Compromise was passed once again which saw the United States at an impasse over who should take power. It signalled the end of the project of Reconstruction.

Key Points of the Compromise


• In February 1877, the Compromise was an informal deal between the Republican Party and Southern Democrats. In return for the Republicans (a) aiding various infrastructure projects and (b) withdrawing federal troops from the South, those Democrats would accept the Republican, Rutherford Hayes, as President.



• The Democratic candidate, Samuel Tilden, had not only clearly won the popular vote, but more narrowly led the Electoral College vote. However, twenty Electoral College votes were disputed in Florida, Louisiana and South Carolina. An electoral commission was appointed to rule on these results. Divided on party lines, it awarded all twenty votes to Hayes who, as a result, won the Electoral College by a single vote.


Reasons for Agreement


• South wanted to end Reconstruction.



• Republicans wanted to focus attention on economic recovery after the ‘panic’ of 1873.


Thus, the Compromise showed that the project of Reconstruction had largely been a failure in that the two halves of the union had not been successfully reunited - at least not in party political terms. Accept any other valid responses.

bottom of page