top of page
Outline one or more biological explanation(s) for schizophrenia. Compare biological explanation(s) for schizophrenia with the family dysfunction explanation for schizophrenia.
AQA
A Level
Abnormal Psychology
Free Essay
## The Interplay of Nature and Nurture in Schizophrenia: A Critical Examination of Biological and Family Dysfunction Explanations
Schizophrenia, a chronic and debilitating mental illness, is characterized by profound disturbances in thought, perception, emotion, and behavior. Understanding its etiology is crucial for effective treatment and management. While historically attributed solely to psychological factors, the pendulum has swung towards biological explanations in recent decades. This essay critically evaluates both biological perspectives, encompassing genetics, neurotransmitters, and brain structure, and the family dysfunction explanation for schizophrenia, aiming to highlight the complex interplay between nature and nurture.
**Biological Explanations:**
The biological perspective posits that schizophrenia arises primarily from physiological abnormalities.
* **Genetic Transmission:** Family studies consistently demonstrate higher concordance rates for schizophrenia among closer relatives. Twin studies further solidify this link, with significantly higher concordance in monozygotic (MZ) twins compared to dizygotic (DZ) twins. Adoption studies offer compelling evidence, showing increased risk for the disorder in adopted children with biological parents diagnosed with schizophrenia. While pinpointing specific genes remains challenging due to its polygenic nature, candidate genes like PCM1, NRG3, and ERBB4 are implicated. However, concordance rates are not 100%, suggesting a significant role for environmental factors.
* **Dopamine Hypothesis:** This widely recognized theory proposes that schizophrenia results from excess dopamine activity in the mesolimbic pathway, leading to positive symptoms like hallucinations and delusions. Conversely, low dopamine activity in the mesocortical pathway is thought to contribute to negative symptoms like apathy and social withdrawal. The effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs, which block dopamine receptors, supports this hypothesis. However, this model oversimplifies the complex interplay of neurotransmitters, neglecting the role of serotonin and glutamate. Furthermore, drug effectiveness does not necessarily imply causation.
* **Neural Correlates:** Brain imaging studies consistently reveal structural and functional abnormalities in individuals with schizophrenia, including enlarged ventricles, reduced grey matter, and anomalies in the basal ganglia, prefrontal cortex, and temporal lobes. While these findings are compelling, a crucial limitation remains: the inability to determine causation. These abnormalities could be a consequence of the illness rather than its cause. Moreover, individual differences in brain structure and function add to the complexity.
**Family Dysfunction Explanation:**
In contrast to the biological perspective, the family dysfunction explanation focuses on the role of dysfunctional family dynamics as potential triggers for schizophrenia. This model highlights:
* **Abnormal Communication Patterns:** Double-bind communication, where contradictory messages are conveyed, can create confusion and stress, potentially contributing to the development of psychotic symptoms.
* **High Expressed Emotion:** Families characterized by high expressed emotion exhibit excessive criticism, hostility, and emotional over-involvement, which can exacerbate symptoms and increase relapse rates.
* **Dysfunctional Family Structures:** Schismatic families marked by conflict and disharmony, and skewed families dominated by one parent's pathology, are believed to be detrimental.
Observational studies observing higher relapse rates in families with high expressed emotion lend credence to this theory. However, this model faces significant limitations. The most glaring is its correlational nature, making it impossible to establish a definitive cause-and-effect relationship. Additionally, methodological issues like observer bias and retrospective recall bias further complicate the picture. Ethically, this model raises concerns about blaming families and perpetuating harmful stigma.
**Comparison and Conclusion:**
While both perspectives offer valuable insights into schizophrenia, their limitations necessitate a nuanced approach. The biological perspective, with its emphasis on genetics, neurotransmitters, and brain structure, provides compelling evidence for the biological underpinnings of the illness. However, it risks biological determinism, neglecting the influence of environmental factors. The family dysfunction model, while highlighting the crucial role of family dynamics, suffers from methodological limitations and ethical concerns.
A comprehensive understanding of schizophrenia requires an interactionist approach, acknowledging the complex interplay of biological vulnerabilities and environmental stressors. This perspective acknowledges that individuals with a genetic predisposition may be more susceptible to the detrimental effects of dysfunctional family environments. Conversely, a supportive family environment may mitigate the risk and improve outcomes for individuals with biological vulnerabilities.
In conclusion, while the debate between biological and family dysfunction explanations continues, it is increasingly clear that neither viewpoint offers a complete picture. Embracing an interactionist perspective, fostering research on gene-environment interactions, and promoting family interventions alongside biological treatments are crucial for advancing our understanding and improving the lives of individuals with schizophrenia.
bottom of page