top of page

Describe what psychologists have discovered about traditional and modern theories of leadership (universalist and behavioural theories, adaptive leadership, three levels of leadership).

CAMBRIDGE

A level and AS level

Leadership

Download Essay

This essay is free to download in PDF format

Free Essay 

Traditional and Modern Theories of Leadership

Leadership, a multifaceted concept, has been extensively studied and theorized upon. This essay will delve into traditional and modern leadership theories, examining their strengths and limitations, and illustrating their relevance in contemporary organizational contexts.

Universalist and Behavioural Theories

Early leadership theories, often termed "universalist," centered around the notion of inherent traits that distinguished leaders from followers. The Great Man Theory, proposed by Woods (1913), epitomizes this approach. It posits that leaders possess innate qualities like charisma, intelligence, and determination, suggesting leadership is a product of birth, not nurture. This theory, while intuitively appealing, has been criticized for its elitist undertones and lack of empirical support.

In contrast, behavioural theories emerged, emphasizing observable actions and styles of leadership. The Ohio State Studies (Fleishman, 1951) identified two key dimensions: initiating structure (task-oriented behaviours) and consideration (people-oriented behaviours). Similarly, the Michigan Studies (Likert, 1961) distinguished between task-oriented and relationship-oriented leaders. These studies shifted the focus from innate traits to learnable behaviours, suggesting leadership development was possible through training and experience.

Adaptive Leadership (Heifetz, 1997)

Moving beyond static traits and behaviours, adaptive leadership, as proposed by Heifetz (1997), highlights the dynamic interplay between leaders and followers in navigating complex challenges. This approach recognizes that leadership is not solely vested in a designated individual but is distributed throughout the organization. Adaptive leaders focus on mobilizing and empowering individuals to confront tough realities, learn from their experiences, and develop innovative solutions. For instance, during times of organizational change, an adaptive leader would focus on fostering open communication, soliciting diverse perspectives, and supporting employees in adapting to new realities.

Three Levels of Leadership (Scouller, 2011)

Scouller's (2011) model proposes three interconnected levels of leadership: public, private, and personal. Public leadership pertains to influencing groups, often in formal settings, involving activities like setting a strategic vision, communicating goals, and inspiring collective action. Private leadership focuses on one-on-one interactions, building relationships, providing support, and fostering individual growth. Personal leadership, considered the foundation by Scouller, emphasizes self-awareness, emotional intelligence, and ethical values.

For instance, a CEO demonstrating public leadership might deliver an inspiring speech outlining the company's vision. That same CEO, exemplifying private leadership, might mentor a high-potential employee, providing guidance and support. Personal leadership, underpinning both, would involve the CEO continuously reflecting on their values, managing their emotions effectively, and acting with integrity.

Conclusion

From the trait-based Great Man Theory to the dynamic framework of adaptive leadership, our understanding of effective leadership has evolved significantly. While traditional theories provide foundational insights into leadership qualities and styles, modern approaches like adaptive leadership and Scouller's three levels emphasize the importance of context, adaptability, and the leader's inner capacity for growth and self-awareness. Ultimately, effective leadership in today's complex world demands a blend of these perspectives, enabling individuals to inspire, empower, and guide others towards shared goals.

**References** * Fleishman, E. A. (1951). *The Description of Supervisory Behavior*. Journal of Applied Psychology. * Heifetz, R. A. (1997). *Leadership without Easy Answers*. Harvard University Press. * Likert, R. (1961). *New Patterns of Management*. McGraw-Hill. * Scouller, J. (2011). *The Three Levels of Leadership: How to Develop Your Leadership Presence, Knowhow and Skill*. Management Books. * Woods, F. A. (1913). *The Influence of Monarchs: Steps in the Evolution of Kingship*. The Macmillan Company.
bottom of page