top of page

Aim: To investigate the factors that influence bystander helping behavior in a real-life setting.

Social Approach

Psychology Notes

 A Level/AS Level/O Level

Social Approach

Social Psychology: Helping Behavior

You're walking down the street, and you see someone lying on the sidewalk. You stop for a moment, unsure what to do. Then, you notice other people are also looking, but no one is stepping in to help. This is the bystander effect: the tendency for individuals to be less likely to help someone in need when there are other people present.

1. The Bystander Effect

Why does this happen?

  • Diffusion of Responsibility: When there are multiple bystanders, each person feels less responsible for taking action. They think, "Someone else will help, so I don't need to."
  • Pluralistic Ignorance: We look to others for cues on how to behave. If no one else seems concerned, we assume the situation isn't serious and we don't need to intervene.
  • Fear of Social Blunders: We might be afraid of making a mistake or appearing foolish, especially in situations where we're unsure what's happening.

2. The Latane & Darley Study (1968) - A Classic Example

This study famously demonstrated the bystander effect. Participants were placed in separate rooms and told to communicate through an intercom system. A "participant" (actually a pre-recorded voice) started to have a seizure.

  • Result: When participants believed they were alone with the victim, 85% of them helped within two minutes. However, when they believed there were four other participants, only 31% helped.

3. Factors that Influence Helping Behavior

While the bystander effect shows the power of social influence, there are other factors that can make someone more likely to help:

  • Ambiguity of the Situation: If it's clear someone needs help, people are more likely to intervene. If the situation is unclear, the bystander effect is stronger.
  • Victim's Characteristics: People are more likely to help someone who is perceived as similar to themselves, innocent, or deserving of help.
  • Relationship to the Victim: We are more likely to help friends and family members.
  • Mood: People in a positive mood are more likely to help, while those in a negative mood might be more focused on themselves.
  • Personal Values: Some people are simply more altruistic than others, meaning they are more likely to help out of concern for others' well-being.

4. Real-World Implications

Understanding the bystander effect can help us create safer communities and encourage people to take action.

  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating people about the bystander effect can help individuals become more aware of their own behavior and encourage them to overcome the social barriers.
  • Training Programs: Programs like "Bystander Intervention Training" teach people how to identify situations where help is needed, overcome the bystander effect, and intervene safely.
  • Personal Responsibility: We can all choose to be active bystanders and make a conscious effort to help when we see someone in need.

Remember, even a small action can make a big difference. By understanding the social factors that influence helping behavior, we can all work together to create a more caring and supportive world.

Bonus Notes

Bystander Helping Behavior: A Critical Examination

1. Methodological Strengths and Limitations of Naturalistic Observation:

Strengths:

⭐High Ecological Validity: Observing behavior in natural settings yields realistic and authentic data.
⭐Unbiased Observation: Subjects are unaware of being studied, minimizing potential for reactivity or altered behavior.

Limitations:

⭐Control Issues: Lack of control over extraneous variables makes it difficult to establish causal relationships.
⭐Subjectivity: Observer bias and interpretation can influence data analysis.
⭐Limited Generalizability: Findings may not be applicable to other situations or populations.

2. Situational Factors Influencing Helping:

⭐Presence of Others: The diffusion of responsibility (feeling less accountable when others are present) reduces likelihood of helping.
⭐Perceived Anonymity: Individuals are less likely to help when they believe they remain anonymous, reducing the potential for social approval or disapproval.

3. Cognitive Factors Influencing Helping:

⭐Empathy: The ability to understand and share another's emotional state increases the likelihood of helping.
⭐Attribution Biases: Attributing the victim's plight to internal factors (their fault) reduces the likelihood of helping.

4. Personality Traits and Helping Behavior:

⭐Agreeableness: Individuals high in agreeableness are more likely to be helpful, showing concern for others and prioritizing social harmony.
⭐Social Responsibility: Individuals with a strong sense of social responsibility feel obligated to help those in need, regardless of personal cost.

5. Ethical Implications of Studying Bystander Helping Behavior:

⭐Privacy Concerns: Observing real-life situations raises ethical concerns about privacy violation and potential distress for participants.
⭐Potential for Harm: Research conducted in emergencies can potentially interfere with helping efforts or create further distress for victims.
⭐Informed Consent: Obtaining informed consent from participants in real-life scenarios is often impossible, raising ethical dilemmas.

Researchers must carefully weigh the ethical implications of their research and prioritize the well-being of participants while striving to collect valuable insights into bystander helping behavior.

bottom of page