Aim: To investigate the factors that influence bystander helping behavior in a real-life setting.
Social Approach
Psychology Notes
A Level/AS Level/O Level
Social Approach
Social Psychology: Helping Behavior
You're walking down the street, and you see someone lying on the sidewalk. You stop for a moment, unsure what to do. Then, you notice other people are also looking, but no one is stepping in to help. This is the bystander effect: the tendency for individuals to be less likely to help someone in need when there are other people present.
1. The Bystander Effect
Why does this happen?
- Diffusion of Responsibility: When there are multiple bystanders, each person feels less responsible for taking action. They think, "Someone else will help, so I don't need to."
- Pluralistic Ignorance: We look to others for cues on how to behave. If no one else seems concerned, we assume the situation isn't serious and we don't need to intervene.
- Fear of Social Blunders: We might be afraid of making a mistake or appearing foolish, especially in situations where we're unsure what's happening.
2. The Latane & Darley Study (1968) - A Classic Example
This study famously demonstrated the bystander effect. Participants were placed in separate rooms and told to communicate through an intercom system. A "participant" (actually a pre-recorded voice) started to have a seizure.
- Result: When participants believed they were alone with the victim, 85% of them helped within two minutes. However, when they believed there were four other participants, only 31% helped.
3. Factors that Influence Helping Behavior
While the bystander effect shows the power of social influence, there are other factors that can make someone more likely to help:
- Ambiguity of the Situation: If it's clear someone needs help, people are more likely to intervene. If the situation is unclear, the bystander effect is stronger.
- Victim's Characteristics: People are more likely to help someone who is perceived as similar to themselves, innocent, or deserving of help.
- Relationship to the Victim: We are more likely to help friends and family members.
- Mood: People in a positive mood are more likely to help, while those in a negative mood might be more focused on themselves.
- Personal Values: Some people are simply more altruistic than others, meaning they are more likely to help out of concern for others' well-being.
4. Real-World Implications
Understanding the bystander effect can help us create safer communities and encourage people to take action.
- Public Awareness Campaigns: Educating people about the bystander effect can help individuals become more aware of their own behavior and encourage them to overcome the social barriers.
- Training Programs: Programs like "Bystander Intervention Training" teach people how to identify situations where help is needed, overcome the bystander effect, and intervene safely.
- Personal Responsibility: We can all choose to be active bystanders and make a conscious effort to help when we see someone in need.
Remember, even a small action can make a big difference. By understanding the social factors that influence helping behavior, we can all work together to create a more caring and supportive world.
Bonus Notes
Bystander Helping Behavior: A Critical Examination
1. Methodological Strengths and Limitations of Naturalistic Observation:
Strengths:
⭐High Ecological Validity: Observing behavior in natural settings yields realistic and authentic data.
⭐Unbiased Observation: Subjects are unaware of being studied, minimizing potential for reactivity or altered behavior.
Limitations:
⭐Control Issues: Lack of control over extraneous variables makes it difficult to establish causal relationships.
⭐Subjectivity: Observer bias and interpretation can influence data analysis.
⭐Limited Generalizability: Findings may not be applicable to other situations or populations.
2. Situational Factors Influencing Helping:
⭐Presence of Others: The diffusion of responsibility (feeling less accountable when others are present) reduces likelihood of helping.
⭐Perceived Anonymity: Individuals are less likely to help when they believe they remain anonymous, reducing the potential for social approval or disapproval.
3. Cognitive Factors Influencing Helping:
⭐Empathy: The ability to understand and share another's emotional state increases the likelihood of helping.
⭐Attribution Biases: Attributing the victim's plight to internal factors (their fault) reduces the likelihood of helping.
4. Personality Traits and Helping Behavior:
⭐Agreeableness: Individuals high in agreeableness are more likely to be helpful, showing concern for others and prioritizing social harmony.
⭐Social Responsibility: Individuals with a strong sense of social responsibility feel obligated to help those in need, regardless of personal cost.
5. Ethical Implications of Studying Bystander Helping Behavior:
⭐Privacy Concerns: Observing real-life situations raises ethical concerns about privacy violation and potential distress for participants.
⭐Potential for Harm: Research conducted in emergencies can potentially interfere with helping efforts or create further distress for victims.
⭐Informed Consent: Obtaining informed consent from participants in real-life scenarios is often impossible, raising ethical dilemmas.
Researchers must carefully weigh the ethical implications of their research and prioritize the well-being of participants while striving to collect valuable insights into bystander helping behavior.