top of page
Previous
Next Essay

N
Marxist sociologists argue that the concentration of media ownership gives the owners considerable power including the ability to manipulate opinions. The growth of new media raises further concerns about the importance of ownership and control of the media.
Other sociologists argue that to remain profitable, the media have to produce what their audiences want. They also argue that the media carry a wider range of opinions than Marxists recognise.21 Applying material from Item N and your knowledge, evaluate Marxist views of the relationship between ownership and control of the media.

AQA

A Level

2024

👑Complete Model Essay

Free Essay Plan

Evaluating Marxist Views on Media Ownership and Control

This essay will evaluate Marxist perspectives on the relationship between ownership and control of the media, considering both traditional and contemporary arguments. It will analyze the extent to which the concentration of media ownership empowers owners to manipulate public opinion, taking into account the rise of new media and its potential impact. Furthermore, the essay will examine alternative perspectives, such as pluralism, that challenge the Marxist view.

Marxist Perspectives on Media Ownership and Control

Marxist perspectives argue that the media serves the interests of the ruling class by promoting their ideologies and values. This control is achieved through the concentration of media ownership in the hands of a few powerful individuals and corporations (Hegemonic Marxism).

  • Manipulation and Instrumental Marxism: Marxists contend that the media actively manipulates audiences through techniques like agenda setting, gatekeeping, and news values, promoting specific narratives that benefit the powerful.
  • Ideological State Apparatus (ISA): The media, as an ISA, plays a crucial role in shaping public consciousness and maintaining the existing power structures.
  • Propaganda Model: This model, developed by Edward Herman and Noam Chomsky, argues that the media, influenced by corporate interests, functions as a propaganda machine, filtering information and promoting a particular worldview.

The Impact of New Media

The emergence of new media, including social media and citizen journalism, has significantly altered the landscape of media ownership and control.

  • Decentralization of Power: New media platforms can empower ordinary individuals to bypass traditional media outlets and disseminate information directly, potentially challenging the dominance of established players.
  • Competition and Choice: The rise of new media has led to increased competition and choice for consumers, potentially diminishing the influence of traditional media conglomerates.
  • Technological Convergence: The convergence of different media platforms has created opportunities for new forms of media ownership and control.
  • Neophiliacs and Active Audiences: However, some argue that new media has also created opportunities for neophiliacs, individuals who are easily swayed by novelty, and can be manipulated by algorithms and personalized content.

Challenging Marxist Perspectives: Pluralism

Pluralist perspectives challenge Marxist views by arguing that the media market is characterized by competition and diversity. They assert that audiences are active and discerning consumers, able to choose from a wide range of media outlets and content.

  • Profit Motive: Pluralists argue that the need to remain profitable compels media organizations to cater to the demands of their audiences, leading to a diversity of opinions and perspectives.
  • Active Audiences: They emphasize the role of audiences in shaping media content and resisting manipulation.
  • Feminist Perspectives: Feminist perspectives also challenge Marxist assumptions about media control, arguing that women actively use and challenge the media to articulate their own perspectives and experiences.

Conclusion

The relationship between media ownership and control is complex and constantly evolving. While Marxist perspectives provide valuable insights into the potential for media manipulation and the influence of powerful interests, it is important to acknowledge the influence of new media, competition, and the active role of audiences. Ultimately, establishing a balanced perspective on this issue requires an understanding of the interplay between the powerful forces of media ownership and the dynamic and ever-changing media landscape.

Marxist Perspectives on Media Ownership and Control

Marxist sociologists have long argued that the media plays a crucial role in maintaining capitalist ideology and reinforcing class inequality. They contend that the concentration of media ownership in the hands of a small, powerful elite allows them to shape public opinion and serve their own economic interests. This essay will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of Marxist views on the relationship between ownership and control of the media, drawing upon Item N and wider sociological knowledge.

Concentration of Ownership and Ideological Control

Marxists, particularly those aligned with the instrumental approach, argue that the media operate as a tool for the ruling class to transmit their dominant ideology. Item N highlights this perspective by stating that "the concentration of media ownership gives the owners considerable power including the ability to manipulate opinions." This aligns with the concept of the "ideological state apparatus" proposed by Louis Althusser, where institutions like the media subtly promote capitalist values and normalize inequality. For example, news outlets owned by corporations might downplay issues like worker exploitation or environmental damage to protect their economic interests.

The concept of "gatekeeping" further exemplifies this control. Owners and editors act as gatekeepers, deciding which issues are covered and how they are framed. This can lead to the marginalization of alternative perspectives and the reinforcement of the status quo. For instance, media outlets owned by Rupert Murdoch have been accused of promoting a right-wing agenda, demonstrating how ownership can influence content.

Challenges to the Marxist Perspective: Pluralism and Audience Agency

However, critics argue that the Marxist view is overly deterministic and ignores the role of audience agency and market forces. Pluralist perspectives emphasize the diversity of media ownership and argue that competition encourages media outlets to cater to a wide range of views to attract audiences. Item N reflects this by suggesting that "the media have to produce what their audiences want" to remain profitable.

The rise of new media further complicates the Marxist perspective. The internet and social media platforms have given rise to citizen journalism and alternative media outlets, offering a wider range of perspectives and challenging the dominance of traditional media conglomerates. This supports the idea that audiences are not passive recipients of information but active consumers who can choose what to engage with.

Neo-Marxist Approaches: Hegemony and Cultural Production

Recognizing the limitations of the instrumental approach, neo-Marxist perspectives like hegemonic Marxism offer a more nuanced understanding of media influence. Antonio Gramsci argued that cultural hegemony, the dominance of ruling-class ideas through consent rather than coercion, plays a significant role in maintaining power. This suggests that media content does not necessarily reflect the direct interests of owners but rather reinforces a broader set of dominant ideologies that serve to maintain the capitalist system.

Furthermore, neo-Marxists acknowledge the role of media professionals and the complexities of cultural production. While ownership might create a framework for influence, journalists and creatives have some autonomy in shaping content. This explains why even within a concentrated media landscape, a degree of diversity of opinion and representation can exist.

Conclusion

While the Marxist perspective on media ownership and control offers valuable insights into the relationship between capitalism, ideology, and the media, it is not without its limitations. While the concentration of ownership remains a concern, the rise of new media and the complexities of cultural production present challenges to traditional Marxist interpretations. A comprehensive understanding of the media's role requires acknowledging both the potential for ideological influence exercised through ownership and the agency of audiences and media professionals in shaping and consuming media content.

N
Marxist sociologists argue that the concentration of media ownership gives the owners considerable power including the ability to manipulate opinions. The growth of new media raises further concerns about the importance of ownership and control of the media.
Other sociologists argue that to remain profitable, the media have to produce what their audiences want. They also argue that the media carry a wider range of opinions than Marxists recognise.21 Applying material from Item N and your knowledge, evaluate Marxist views of the relationship between ownership and control of the media.

Free Mark Scheme Extracts

Concepts and Issues

Concepts and issues such as the following may appear:

  • Hegemonic Marxism/neo-Marxism
  • Manipulative/instrumental Marxism
  • Pluralism
  • New Media
  • Competition and choice
  • Ideology
  • Ideological state apparatus
  • Bias
  • News values
  • Agenda setting
  • Gatekeeping
  • Concentration of ownership
  • Horizontal and vertical integration
  • Synergy
  • Technological convergence
  • Media diversity
  • Media conglomerates
  • Propaganda model
  • Active and passive audiences
  • Neophiliacs
  • Citizen journalism
  • Feminisms
  • Postmodernism
bottom of page