‘Pupil attainment is determined by factors outside of school.’ Using sociological material, give arguments against this view.
CAMBRIDGE
A level and AS level
2022
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the topic of labelling in education and its impact on pupil outcomes. State your thesis: Labelling in education, influenced by factors such as class, gender, and ethnicity, significantly impacts pupil outcomes, although individual agency also plays a role.
The Influence of Class and Perceived Ability
Argument 1: Middle-Class Advantage
Discuss how perceived middle-class identity can lead to preferential treatment and placement in higher sets (Rist, Cicourel, Kitsuse).
Argument 2: Lower Sets and Negative Assumptions
Explain how working-class and minority ethnic students may be disadvantaged due to assumptions about their abilities and behavior (Gillborn, Youdell).
Gender, Stereotypes, and Educational Outcomes
Argument 3: Gendered Expectations
Analyze how gender stereotypes shape teacher expectations and interactions, impacting pupils' opportunities and self-perceptions (Mac an Ghaill).
The Power of the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Argument 4: Expectations and Attainment
Explain the concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy and how teacher expectations can influence student performance (Rosenthal, Jacobson).
Labelling, Identity, and Educational Experiences
Argument 5: Negative Impacts of Labelling
Discuss the negative consequences of labelling, streaming, and biased perceptions on pupil self-concept, motivation, and relationships (interactionist theories, Boaler, Hargreaves, Willis, Liu, Xie).
The Role of Pupil Agency
Argument 6: Challenging Determinism
Acknowledge the role of student agency in shaping their own educational outcomes, challenging the deterministic view of labelling theory.
Conclusion
Summarize the key arguments and reiterate that while labelling based on social factors has a significant impact on pupil outcomes, individual agency also plays a crucial role. Suggest areas for further research or potential solutions to mitigate the negative effects of labelling in education.
The Complex Interplay of Social Factors and Educational Attainment
This essay will argue that while individuals have agency in their educational journeys, social factors such as class, gender, and ethnicity significantly influence educational opportunities and outcomes. Drawing on sociological research, it will explore how labelling, streaming, and teacher perceptions can create self-fulfilling prophecies, impacting student self-concept and achievement.
The Influence of Class on Educational Opportunities
Argument 1: Research suggests that students' perceived social class can impact their educational trajectory. Rist (1970), in his study of an American kindergarten, found that teachers used social cues like language and dress to group children into 'fast learners', 'average', and 'slow learners'. This labelling, often based on markers of middle-class identity, influenced the children's access to resources and teacher attention. Similarly, Cicourel and Kitsuse (1963) demonstrated how counsellors' perceptions of students' social class influenced their guidance regarding college applications, potentially limiting opportunities for working-class students.
Argument 2: Conversely, students from working-class backgrounds might find themselves placed in lower sets due to teachers' assumptions about their abilities or behaviour. Gillborn and Youdell (2000) argue that schools often operate within a system of "educational triage," where resources are directed towards students deemed most likely to succeed. This can result in working-class students being denied access to higher-level courses and opportunities.
Gender, Ethnicity, and Educational Experiences
Argument 3: Gender stereotypes also play a role in shaping educational experiences. Mac an Ghaill's (1994) study of a school in the Midlands found that teachers held different expectations of boys and girls, often reinforcing traditional gender roles. This can lead to boys being encouraged in STEM subjects while girls are steered towards humanities, potentially limiting their future choices.
Argument 5: The impact of ethnicity on educational experiences is undeniable. Studies by Boaler (2002), Hargreaves et al. (1975), and Willis (1977) highlight how labelling, streaming, and teacher perceptions influenced by ethnicity can negatively affect students' self-concept, motivation, and relationships. Liu and Xie (2016) demonstrate how discrimination within the education system can create barriers to success for minority ethnic students.
The Power of the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Argument 4: The concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy, as demonstrated by Rosenthal and Jacobson's (1968) influential study, highlights how teacher expectations can significantly impact student attainment. When teachers hold high expectations, students are more likely to rise to the challenge. Conversely, low expectations can lead to a decline in student motivation and performance.
Student Agency and Resistance
Argument 6: While social factors exert a powerful influence, it is crucial to acknowledge student agency. Students are not passive recipients of labelling and expectations. They can and do resist negative stereotypes and strive for success, even within limiting structures.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while students possess agency in their educational journeys, social factors such as class, gender, and ethnicity profoundly influence their opportunities and outcomes. Labelling, streaming, and teacher perceptions can create self-fulfilling prophecies, impacting student self-concept and achievement. It is essential to recognize and address these inequalities to create a truly equitable education system that allows all individuals to reach their full potential.
**References** * Boaler, J. (2002). *Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches*. Routledge. * Cicourel, A. V., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1963). *The educational decision-makers*. Bobbs-Merrill. * Gillborn, D., & Youdell, D. (2000). *Rationing education: Policy, practice, reform and equity*. Open University Press. * Hargreaves, D. H., Hester, S. K., & Mellor, F. J. (1975). *Deviance in classrooms*. Routledge. * Liu, W., & Xie, Y. (2016). Educational aspirations of rural youth in China: The roles of family socioeconomic status, social capital and cultural capital. *International Journal of Educational Development*, *51*, 102-111. * Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994). *The making of men: Masculinities, sexualities and schooling*. Open University Press. * Rist, R. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. *Harvard Educational Review*, *40*(3), 411-451. * Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils' intellectual development. *Holt, Rinehart and Winston*. * Willis, P. (1977). *Learning to Labor: How working class kids get working class jobs*. Columbia University Press.Free Mark Scheme Extracts
Arguments for the Impact of Social Factors on Educational Attainment
Here are some arguments that highlight the influence of social factors on educational attainment:
Argument 1:
- Pupils are often placed on fast learner tables or college entry courses based on perceived middle class identity (Rist, Cicourel, Kitsuse), rather than solely external factors.
Argument 2:
- Pupils may be placed in lower sets due to assumptions of their abilities or disciplinary issues, often influenced by factors like class or ethnicity (Gillborn, Youdell).
Argument 3:
- Gender stereotypes can lead to biased expectations and interactions that impact pupils’ opportunities and self-concepts (Mac an Ghaill).
Argument 4:
- The self-fulfilling prophecy can have measurable effects on pupil attainment, where expectations influence outcomes (Rosenthal, Jacobson).
Argument 5:
- Labelling, streaming, and teacher perceptions of ethnicity and discrimination can negatively affect pupils' self-concept, motivation, and relationships (interactionist theories, Boaler, Hargreaves, Willis, Liu, Xie).
Argument 6:
- Pupils have agency in their own performance, challenging the notion that attainment is solely determined by external factors.