‘Globalisation has resulted in greater inequality between countries.’ Evaluate this view
CAMBRIDGE
A level and AS level
2023
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Define globalisation and its key features (economic, political, cultural). Introduce the debate: While some argue globalisation fuels inequality between countries, others view it as a force for progress and convergence. This essay will evaluate both sides.
Arguments Supporting Increased Inequality
Marxist/Dependency Theory Perspective:
- Globalisation as neo-colonialism, benefiting Western corporations and elites.
- Exploitation of cheap labor and resources in developing countries.
- Widening gap between the rich and poor nations.
- Example: Impact of sweatshops and unfair trade practices.
Cultural Homogenization and Erosion of Local Economies:
- Westernization and the dominance of global brands can stifle local businesses.
- Loss of cultural identity and traditional practices.
- Brain drain: Skilled workers migrating to developed countries.
Arguments Against Increased Inequality
Modernization Theory and Neoliberalism:
- Free trade and globalization promote economic growth for all.
- Increased investment and technology transfer to developing countries.
- Success stories of countries that have benefited from globalization (e.g., South Korea, Singapore).
Spread of Democracy and Human Rights:
- Globalization as a catalyst for democratization and human rights advancements.
- Increased interconnectedness fosters international cooperation and accountability.
- However, acknowledge limitations and uneven progress.
Evaluation and Conclusion
Acknowledge the complexity of the issue: Globalisation's impact on inequality is multifaceted and context-dependent.
Provide a balanced view: While globalization presents opportunities for development, it can exacerbate existing inequalities if not managed equitably.
Suggest potential solutions: Fair trade practices, responsible investment, and global governance mechanisms to mitigate negative consequences.
Has Globalisation Resulted in Greater Inequality Between Countries?
Globalisation, the increasing interconnectedness of the world through trade, technology, and cultural exchange, has sparked debate about its impact on global inequality. While some argue that it has exacerbated disparities between nations, others contend that it has fostered development and reduced inequality. This essay will critically evaluate both sides of this argument, ultimately concluding that while globalisation has the potential to reduce inequality, it has, in practice, often exacerbated it.
Arguments Supporting Increased Inequality
Critics of globalisation, particularly those aligned with Marxist perspectives, argue that it represents a form of neo-colonialism. They contend that powerful Western nations and multinational corporations exploit developing countries for cheap labour, resources, and markets, leading to a widening wealth gap. Wallerstein's World Systems Theory (1974) exemplifies this view, portraying a capitalist world economy where core countries (developed nations) benefit at the expense of periphery countries (developing nations).
Furthermore, the argument for increased inequality highlights that globalisation often leads to a 'race to the bottom'. To attract foreign investment, developing countries may be pressured to lower labour standards, environmental regulations, and corporate taxes, creating a competitive disadvantage and hindering long-term development. This can result in sweatshops, environmental degradation, and diminished social safety nets, exacerbating inequality within developing countries and between them and their wealthier counterparts.
The "brain drain" phenomenon further exemplifies how globalisation can contribute to inequality. Skilled workers from developing countries, enticed by better opportunities, often migrate to developed nations. While this benefits the individual and the host country, it deprives developing countries of vital human capital, hindering their growth potential and contributing to a cycle of dependency.
Arguments Against Increased Inequality
Proponents of globalisation, primarily neoliberals and modernisation theorists, argue that it fosters economic growth and development, ultimately benefiting all countries involved. They point to the success of countries like South Korea and Singapore, which have embraced global trade and foreign investment to achieve remarkable economic transformation.
They argue that free trade and open markets promote efficiency and innovation, leading to lower prices, greater consumer choice, and increased productivity. This, in turn, generates economic growth, creates jobs, and raises living standards, potentially benefiting both developed and developing countries.
Moreover, proponents argue that globalisation facilitates the spread of democracy, human rights, and liberal values by promoting interconnectedness and communication. By engaging with the global community, developing countries can adopt best practices, attract foreign aid, and participate in international institutions that promote development and reduce inequality.
Evaluation and Conclusion
While globalisation has undeniably led to increased global interconnectedness and economic growth in certain areas, the evidence suggests that it has also exacerbated inequality between countries. The benefits of globalisation have been unevenly distributed, with developed nations and multinational corporations reaping a disproportionate share of the rewards.
Although some developing countries have successfully leveraged globalisation for their benefit, many others remain trapped in a cycle of dependency, experiencing exploitative labour practices, environmental degradation, and a "brain drain" of skilled workers. The evidence presented by dependency theorists like Andre Gunder Frank (1969) underscores how global trade can inadvertently perpetuate underdevelopment in certain regions.
In conclusion, while globalisation holds the potential to be a force for good, reducing inequality requires a more equitable distribution of its benefits. This necessitates fairer trade agreements, responsible business practices, and targeted investments in developing countries' education, healthcare, and infrastructure. Without these measures, globalisation is likely to continue widening the gap between rich and poor nations, rather than bridging it.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
Globalisation has resulted in greater inequality between countries. Evaluate this view.
Key focus of the question
The question invites candidates to demonstrate knowledge of what is meant by globalisation and whether it has resulted in greater inequality between countries. Candidates might distinguish between different aspects of globalisation, including economic, political, and social dimensions. However, it would be equally acceptable to focus on one particular form of globalisation, such as the spread of global capitalism.
Arguments supporting the view
Supporters of this view include Marxist sociologists who claim that globalisation is a form of neo-colonialism that benefits the rich and powerful in developed countries at the expense of poorer people in less developed parts of the world. Globalisation might also be seen as a form of creeping westernisation that threatens the culture, national identity, and political autonomy of developing countries.
Good evaluative responses
Good evaluative responses will consider alternative views about the impact of globalisation. This might include references to modernisation theorists and neoliberals who view globalisation as beneficial for all societies and as a force that is helping to reduce inequalities between countries.
Indicative content
For:
- Globalisation is seen by Marxist sociologists as westernisation (or Americanisation) that benefits western capitalist elites at the expense of underprivileged groups in less economically developed countries.
- It is not clear that globalisation has led to a spread of democracy and liberal values in developing societies, potentially leading to greater political and social inequality.
- Global migration may have resulted in a brain drain of talented workers from developing countries, leaving them economically poorer.
- The western model of capitalism promoted through globalisation may hinder development and exacerbate inequality.
- Local cultures in developing societies may be weakened by globalisation, leading to social issues that exacerbate poverty and inequality.
Against:
- Neoliberals argue that free markets and global trade contribute to economic growth in all countries, benefiting everyone.
- Some less developed countries have successfully modernised, showcasing the benefits of globalisation.
- Globalisation has helped spread democracy and liberal values, freeing people from oppressive regimes and exploitative practices.
- Increasing contact between people from different countries is breaking down barriers that could lead to conflict, contributing to social and political stability.
- Modernisation theorists argue that globalisation spreads essential cultural values for successful economic development.