To what extent are family roles changing in modern industrial societies?
Cambridge
O level and GCSE
2020
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Thesis statement: Family roles are undergoing significant changes in modern industrial societies.
Changing Family Roles
Husband and Wife Roles
- Declining traditional gender roles (e.g., breadwinner husband/homemaker wife) - Increasing equality in household tasks and decision-making - Rise of joint conjugal roles influenced by feminism
Children's Roles
- Increasing focus on child well-being and happiness - Children have more autonomy and power in family decisions - Shift from authoritarian to child-centered parenting styles
Grandparents' Roles
- Increasingly active role in childcare, financial support, and emotional support - Extended family structures continue to play an important role
Factors Driving Change
Loss of Family Functions
- State assuming responsibilities once carried out by families (e.g., childcare, education) - Sandwich/pivot generation supporting both children and aging parents
Changing Legislation
- Equality acts, children's acts, and maternity/paternity leave affecting family roles - Increased divorce rates leading to single-parent families and blended families
Secularization
- Reduced pressure for marriage and childbearing - Greater family diversity and acceptance of different family structures
Challenging the Notion of Change
Continuities in Family Roles
- Grandparents' roles have always been significant - Children still have lower status and power than adults - Traditional maternal and paternal roles persist in many families - Women continue to bear primary responsibility for household tasks
Conclusion
- While significant changes have occurred in family roles, there are also continuities - Modern industrial societies have brought about new pressures and opportunities that have shaped family dynamics - Family roles continue to evolve and adapt to changing societal norms.
To What Extent Are Family Roles Changing in Modern Industrial Societies?
Family roles have undoubtedly undergone significant transformations in modern industrial societies (MIS). While some argue these changes signify a complete departure from traditional structures, others maintain that many elements of family life remain relatively consistent. This essay will explore both sides of this debate, examining the extent to which family roles have truly changed in MIS.
The Case for Change
Several factors point towards substantial shifts in family roles. The loss of traditional family functions, for example, has led to the state taking over responsibilities once held by families, such as education and healthcare. This has inevitably altered the dynamics within families.
Feminism has played a crucial role in challenging traditional gender roles. Women's increased participation in the workforce, coupled with legislation promoting gender equality, has led to a rise in joint conjugal roles, where both partners share household and childcare responsibilities. This contrasts sharply with the traditional model of the male breadwinner and female homemaker.
Furthermore, changing social norms have led to greater family diversity. Increased divorce rates, single-parent families, and blended families have all contributed to a wider range of family structures and, consequently, diverse family roles. The traditional nuclear family is no longer the only model, and roles within these new family structures have adapted accordingly.
The role of children has also evolved. In child-centered MIS, children often hold a more central position within the family unit. They are often more involved in decision-making processes and enjoy greater autonomy than previous generations. This shift reflects changing societal values and attitudes towards childhood.
The Case for Continuity
Despite these notable changes, some argue that many aspects of family life remain strikingly similar to traditional structures. For instance, despite the rise of dual-income households, women still shoulder a disproportionate share of domestic labor and childcare. This suggests that while roles may be evolving on the surface, deeper inequalities persist.
Moreover, the paternal role, while arguably experiencing some change, still often adheres to traditional expectations. Fathers are often still viewed as the primary breadwinners and decision-makers within the family, highlighting the enduring influence of patriarchal norms.
Additionally, while new family structures exist, the nuclear family remains a dominant model in MIS. Many individuals still aspire to this traditional family structure, suggesting that its influence remains significant.
Conclusion
Family roles in MIS are undoubtedly in flux, shaped by a confluence of social, economic, and cultural factors. While changes such as increased female workforce participation, greater family diversity, and a more child-centered approach point towards a departure from traditional models, enduring inequalities and the persistence of certain traditional norms suggest that change is not always as profound as it seems. Ultimately, family roles in MIS exist on a spectrum, reflecting both significant evolution and enduring continuities.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
To what extent are family roles changing in modern industrial societies?
Candidates should show an awareness of the various ways that family roles are changing in MIS’s. They are likely to look at husbands’ and wives’ roles in their response but the role of children may also be considered. It is likely that candidates will engage with the feminist debate here.
Possible answers:
FOR
- Loss of family functions means that roles once taken by the family e.g. taking care of the children, are now performed by the state;
- Sandwich/pivot generation – roles of parents now often involve supporting children into adulthood – the boomerang family;
- Changing legislation affects family roles e.g. equality acts, children’s acts, maternity/paternity leave etc;
- Increased levels of divorce in society means that both men and women are having to change their roles to fit the new family structure they find themselves in – single parent, singlehood, blended families etc;
- Secularisation has meant there is less pressure for people to get married and to have children in wedlock – this leads to greater family diversity and therefore different family roles;
- In child-centred MIS’s, the role of the child has changed to be the focus of many families, highly protected and with a lot of power over decisions and day-to-day family life;
- Traditional conjugal roles are typically being replaced by joint conjugal roles, largely due to feminism and the greater power and status women have in both society and the family;
- The maternal role has changed to the rise in working women and childless women;
- The paternal role has changed to reflect the decline in the hegemonic male and the rise in new men and househusbands;
- Grand-parents may be playing an increasingly important role in organizing family life – through childcare, financial and emotional support;
- Other reasonable response.
AGAINST
- Grand-parents always played a large role in family life, through extended family structures so this hasn’t changed;
- Children are still lower in status and power than adult family members and subject to adult authority, this hasn’t changed;
- Whilst there is a lot of evidence to show that families today are more symmetrical it is still typically the woman who performs the majority of the household tasks;
- The maternal role has changed but stereotypes have not and for most women, having children often leads to a career break or to part-time work meaning that they become the primary care giver in the family;
- The paternal role may not have changed much at all in the family – it is still typically the father who is in charge of household finances and important decisions (Edgell, Pahl) as well as being the breadwinner;
- With an increase in boomerang families there has been a continuation in MIS’s of the traditional parent-child relationship;
- There is often a dual or triple burden placed upon women in family life, meaning she is responsible for both paid work, domestic work and emotional work;
- Other reasonable response.