To what extent are all families child-centred?
Cambridge
O level and GCSE
2022
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Introduction
- Briefly introduce the topic of the essay. - State the thesis statement: To what extent are all families child-centred?Arguments for Child-Centred Families
Legislation
- UN 'Rights of the Child' and other laws protect children. - NSPCC and other organisations advocate for children's needs.Socialisation
- Parents teach children social norms and values. - Shows love and care for children.Pester Power
- Advertisers target children as consumers. - Children influence family decisions on purchases.Childhood Innocence
- Childhood is seen as a protected time. - Children are shielded from adult responsibilities.Corporal Punishment
- Smacking children is no longer allowed in many societies. - Symbolises children's increasing power and status.Decision Making
- Children are consulted on family decisions. - Demonstrates their changing role in the family.Bedrooms and Technology
- Children's bedrooms are often filled with comforts and technology. - Indicates their central role in the family.Family Size
- Small families mean children receive more attention and affection. - Creates a child-centred environment.Arguments against Child-Centred Families
Social Control
- Children are still subject to adult authority. - Must obey orders and instructions.Child Abuse
- Not all families are safe for children. - Some children experience abuse and exploitation.Child Carers
- Children may have to care for other family members. - Places them under pressure and adult responsibilities.Poverty and Child Workers
- Many children grow up in poverty. - Some children work to support their families. - Demonstrates that child-centredness is not universal.Child Soldiers
- In some countries, children are forced to fight in wars. - Face danger and the threat of death.Fear and Restrictions
- Children's freedom and movement are often restricted. - Due to parental concerns about 'stranger danger'.Sexualisation of Children
- Children are exposed to adult materials through technology. - May contribute to the loss of childhood innocence.DINK Families
- Childless families by choice. - Contradicts the notion of all families being child-centred.New Right and Lone Parents
- Discuss feral and neglected children. - Challenges the idea of all families being child-centred.Conclusion
- Summarize the main arguments for and against child-centred families. - State the conclusion: The extent to which families are child-centred varies widely depending on factors such as social, cultural, and economic contexts.To What Extent Are All Families Child-Centred?
The concept of a child-centred family suggests that children's needs and wants are prioritised, shaping the family's structure and dynamics. While there is evidence to suggest a shift towards child-centredness in many societies, it is important to recognise that this is not a universal phenomenon. This essay will explore the extent to which families can be considered truly child-centred.
Arguments for child-centred families are abundant in modern Western societies. Legislation, such as the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the work of organisations like the NSPCC, places a strong emphasis on protecting children's rights and well-being. This reflects a societal shift towards recognising children as individuals with agency and needs. Additionally, the prevalence of smaller family sizes allows for greater focus on individual children, showering them with attention and resources. This is further exemplified by the prevalence of technology and material possessions in children's bedrooms, highlighting the family's investment in their comfort and entertainment.
Furthermore, the role of socialisation within the family contributes to the perception of child-centredness. Parents invest significant time and energy in nurturing and guiding their children's development, demonstrating love and care. This is often driven by a desire to equip them with the necessary skills to thrive in society. The influence of "pester power" also underscores the centrality of children in family decision-making. Advertisers recognise children as a powerful consumer demographic, leading families to prioritize their material desires and needs.
However, the claim of universal child-centredness is challenged by several factors. The existence of child abuse serves as a stark reminder that not all families are safe havens. Cases of neglect, physical abuse, and exploitation demonstrate the vulnerability of children within the family structure. Moreover, issues like child poverty and the prevalence of child labour in some parts of the world highlight the stark inequalities that persist. These children are often denied basic rights, including education and a carefree childhood, exposing the limitations of a purely child-centric perspective.
Even in societies that strive for child-centredness, elements of adult control remain. Children are still subject to parental authority and expected to adhere to rules and expectations. Frank Furedi, in his work on "paranoid parenting," argues that contemporary anxieties about "stranger danger" have led to increased restrictions on children's freedom and mobility. Furthermore, the sexualisation of children, fuelled by increased exposure to adult content through technology, as highlighted by Neil Postman, raises concerns about the erosion of childhood innocence.
The New Right perspective, as championed by Charles Murray, challenges the notion of universal child-centredness by highlighting the rise of "unsocialised" or "feral" children. They argue that the breakdown of traditional family structures and a decline in parental authority have led to a generation of neglected and poorly socialised children. This perspective, while controversial, underscores the diversity of family experiences and challenges the idea that all families prioritize children's needs.
In conclusion, while many aspects of modern society point towards a greater focus on children and their well-being, it is inaccurate to claim that all families are child-centred. Although legislation, smaller families, and societal values often prioritize children's needs, the persistence of child abuse, poverty, and varying cultural norms demonstrate that a truly child-centred approach is far from universal. Ultimately, the experience of childhood remains diverse and influenced by a complex interplay of social, economic, and cultural factors.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
To what extent are all families child-centred?
Possible responses:
Arguments for:
- Legislation - this protects children in many ways, putting their needs and wants at the heart of family life e.g. UN ‘Rights of the Child’, NSPCC etc.;
- Socialisation - parents socialise and socially control children to teach them how to fit into society, demonstrating love and care for the children;
- Pester power - advertisers see children now as consumers and thus target the child market specifically. Families are then put under pressure by the child to buy the latest material items and their consumer needs become central to the family;
- Innocence - childhood is now seen as a period of innocence whereby children should not have to work or experience other aspects of the adult world - they are protected and shielded by the family as they are thought to be so important and precious;
- Corporal punishment - families are no longer allowed to smack their children in many societies, symbolising the greater power and status that children now have;
- Decision making - children in a family are now frequently asked their opinion on decisions such as where to holiday, whether to move house, living arrangements after divorce etc., demonstrating the shifting nature of children’s roles in the family - they have more power than previously;
- Bedrooms/technology - in many societies children’s bedrooms are filled with technology and home comforts e.g. TV, laptop, gaming station;
- Family size - contemporary families are often small meaning that the lone child or small number of children receive a lot of love, attention and affection from the family, meaning it is child-centred;
- Any other reasonable response.
Arguments against:
- Social control - despite having more freedom generally in society children are still subject to adult control in the family and ultimately have to obey someone else’s orders and instructions;
- Child abuse - the family is not a loving place of safety for all children, for some it is dangerous and exploitative;
- Child carers - in many families children are performing the role of carer for other family members which sees them placed under pressure and having to take on many adult responsibilities;
- Poverty/child workers - many children grow up in poverty and in some countries children get little if no access to education, demonstrating that child-centredness is not universal;
- Child soldiers - in some countries children, like adults, are expected to fight on the frontline in times of war, facing danger and the threat of death;
- Fear and restrictions - children in many societies are subject to restricted freedom and movement, particularly in the public sphere, due to heightened parental concerns about external and ‘stranger danger’ (Furedi);
- Sexualisation of children - Postman talked about the loss of innocence of contemporary children who, with increased access to technology and social media within the family situation, were increasingly exposed to adult materials such as violence, drug taking and pornography;
- DINK families - contemporary families are often childless through choice which contradicts the notion of child-centredness;
- New Right (Murray)/lone parents - their discussion of unsocialised or feral children, neglected and left to fend for themselves does not support the idea of all families being child-centred;
- Any other reasonable response.