To what extent is there social mobility between social classes?
Cambridge
O level and GCSE
2021
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
- Examples of social mobility between classes (e.g., embourgeoisement, proletarianisation)
- Downward social mobility as evidence of fluidity
- Intragenerational and intergenerational mobility
- Examples of successful individuals from lower social classes (e.g., entrepreneurs, professionals)
- Functionalist perspective on meritocracy
- Intermarriage as a potential avenue for upward mobility
### **Arguments Against Social Mobility** - Limited access to upper class ranks
- Barriers faced by women (e.g., sexism, glass ceiling)
- Institutional racism as a barrier for ethnic groups
- Old boys' networks and nepotism hindering mobility
- Challenges in measuring social mobility (e.g., Goldthorpe study criticisms)
- Marxist perspective on proletarianisation and class stagnation
To What Extent is There Social Mobility Between Social Classes?
Social mobility, the movement of individuals or groups between different social strata, is a complex and hotly debated topic. While modern societies boast increased opportunities and a degree of fluidity, significant barriers remain, making the extent of true social mobility debatable.
Arguments for Social Mobility
Advocates for increased social mobility point to several factors supporting their view. Firstly, legal frameworks, such as the Equal Pay Act, aim to provide equal opportunities regardless of social background. This, theoretically, allows individuals from lower social classes to climb the socioeconomic ladder.
Embourgeoisement, the adoption of middle-class values and lifestyles by working-class individuals, and proletarianisation, the downward movement of middle-class individuals into working-class positions, are cited as evidence of this fluidity. These processes suggest a degree of movement between classes.
Furthermore, examples of intragenerational mobility, where individuals work their way up the class system within their own lifetime, are often cited. Success stories of entrepreneurs like Richard Branson or Lord Sugar, who rose from humble beginnings, fuel this perspective. Similarly, intergenerational mobility, where children surpass their parents’ social class, is seen as evidence of progress. For instance, children of working-class parents becoming doctors or lawyers illustrate this upward trajectory.
Functionalists support this view, arguing that modern industrial societies are largely meritocratic. They believe that hard work and talent, rather than social origin, determine an individual's success.
Arguments Against Social Mobility
However, critics argue that social mobility remains largely aspirational for many. The upper class, they argue, operates as a largely closed system, protecting its wealth and privilege and limiting access to outsiders.
Further, they point to systemic barriers that disproportionately impact certain groups. Feminists highlight the glass ceiling that hinders women's career progression, limiting their upward mobility. Similarly, institutional racism creates obstacles for specific ethnic groups, hindering their chances across various sectors, including education and employment.
Practices like nepotism and the old boys' network, where individuals from privileged backgrounds favour their own, further disadvantage those from lower social classes.
Marxists challenge the notion of widespread mobility, pointing to proletarianisation as a process that maintains the dominance of the upper class. They argue that while some individuals might climb the ladder, the majority of the working class remains confined to lower-paying, less secure positions.
Furthermore, accurately measuring social mobility is difficult. Studies like the Goldthorpe study have faced criticism for their methodologies, raising questions about the true extent and nature of social fluidity.
Conclusion
While social mobility undoubtedly exists, its extent remains limited. While legal frameworks and individual success stories offer a glimmer of hope, systemic barriers and entrenched inequalities persist. While some upward movement is possible, the overall structure of social classes remains largely rigid, suggesting that true equality of opportunity remains elusive for many.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
To what extent is there social mobility between social classes?
Possible arguments for:
- There is now a legal basis for equal opportunities, e.g. the Equal Pay Act, and this means that individuals from the lower social classes are now free to achieve upward mobility in terms of higher pay and status in the workplace. - Embourgeoisement and proletarianisation are examples of how workers may be socially mobile between classes. - Downward social mobility is a reality for some, which illustrates that privilege and high status are no longer ascribed and fixed. - Intragenerational social mobility now occurs in which individuals work hard and move from the working class into the middle class. - There are many examples and case studies of individuals who have risen to the top through entrepreneurial activity, such as Kylie Jenner, Richard Branson, or Lord Sugar. - Intergenerational mobility can now occur wherein children of working-class parents succeed in education and move upwards into middle-class jobs as lawyers, doctors, and accountants, etc. - Functionalists argue that modern industrial societies are mostly meritocratic, so it is accepted that people can rise to the top through hard work and ability. - As societies move away from closed systems, intermarriage becomes possible which may mean upward class mobility for some. - Any other reasonable answer.
Arguments against:
- Critics of social mobility point out that the upper class is still beyond the reach of most – they recruit from within their own class ranks and keep access to their wealth and privilege very restricted. - Feminists would argue that women face obstacles to social class mobility in a way that men don’t – via sexism and the glass ceiling, for example. - Some ethnic groups find it difficult to achieve social class mobility due to barriers linked to institutional racism in all areas of society such as education, the media, employment practices, etc. - Old boys’ network and nepotism can both act as barriers to social mobility for those in lower social classes. - It is difficult to measure social mobility – the Goldthorpe study, for example, has been criticized – so we don’t know precisely the types and degree to which social mobility occurs in a society. - Marxists argue that processes such as proletarianisation occur, which may give the impression of mobility but in fact ensure that most working people remain in the lower end of the class spectrum. - Any other reasonable answer.