To what extent is the peer group the most effective agent of social control?
Cambridge
O level and GCSE
2021
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
I. Introduction
A. Definition of peer group and social control
B. Thesis statement: The extent to which the peer group is the most effective agent of social control
II. Arguments for the Peer Group as the Most Effective Agent
A. Strong influence on socialization into identity
B. Positive sanctions and motivation
C. Need for belonging and threat of rejection
D. Negative peer pressure and ostracism
E. Sarcasm, ridicule, shame, and criticism
F. More powerful than family or education for youth
III. Arguments Against the Peer Group as the Most Effective Agent
A. Family has a greater impact on gender identity
B. Education's hidden curriculum and sanctions
C. Religion's influence on core norms and values
D. Formal social control's severe sanctions
E. Media's pervasive shaping of attitudes and identities
F. Functionalist perspective emphasizes collaboration
G. Workplace's power through pay, promotion, and job security
IV. Conclusion
A. Summary of arguments
B. Reiteration of thesis statement
C. Acknowledgment of complexities and variations
To what extent is the peer group the most effective agent of social control?
Social control refers to the various mechanisms, both formal and informal, that society uses to regulate individual and group behaviour and ensure conformity to norms and values. While numerous agents contribute to this process, including family, education, religion, and the media, this essay will examine the extent to which the peer group stands out as the most effective.
The peer group exerts significant influence, particularly during adolescence, by shaping individuals' sense of identity and belonging. As individuals navigate the complexities of social life, peers provide a sense of normality and acceptance. For instance, peer groups often establish unwritten rules and expectations surrounding gender roles, influencing how young people dress, behave, and interact with others. Those who conform to these norms are rewarded with social acceptance, praise, and companionship, acting as powerful positive sanctions that encourage continued conformity.
Conversely, the fear of rejection and social isolation acts as a potent negative sanction. Individuals, especially young people, crave acceptance and belonging, making the threat of ostracism, ridicule, or bullying a highly effective means of social control. The desire to avoid these negative consequences can lead individuals to modify their behaviour, even if it means compromising personal values or beliefs. This is exemplified in the phenomenon of anti-school subcultures, where peer pressure often supersedes the influence of family and education, leading some students to engage in disruptive or rebellious behaviour to gain acceptance within the group.
However, arguing that the peer group reigns supreme in social control would be an oversimplification. Ann Oakley, in her studies on gender socialization, highlights the profound, often subconscious, influence of family. From an early age, parents engage in practices like canalization (directing children towards gender-specific toys and activities) and manipulation (consciously reinforcing or discouraging certain behaviours based on gender). These early experiences lay the foundation for gender identity, shaping individuals long before peer groups become a dominant force.
Furthermore, institutions like education wield considerable influence through the hidden curriculum. Beyond the formal syllabus, schools instill values of punctuality, obedience, and conformity through their structure and reward systems. Those adhering to these norms are rewarded with good grades and praise, while deviations are met with negative sanctions like detentions or reprimands. These experiences contribute significantly to shaping individuals' understanding of acceptable behaviour within a wider societal context.
Moreover, dismissing the impact of other agents like religion and the media would present an incomplete picture. For many, religion provides a fundamental moral compass, dictating core values and beliefs that guide their actions throughout life. Similarly, in our media-saturated world, the internet, television, and social media platforms exert a constant influence, shaping perceptions, attitudes, and aspirations. These agents often intersect and interact with the peer group, making it difficult to isolate the impact of one over the others.
In conclusion, while the peer group undeniably exerts a considerable influence on individual behaviour, particularly during formative years, it would be inaccurate to crown it as the most effective agent of social control. The complex interplay between family, education, religion, media, and the peer group itself contributes to the intricate process of socialization. Ultimately, understanding the relative influence of these agents requires a nuanced approach that considers individual experiences, cultural contexts, and the specific norms and values being transmitted.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
To what extent is the peer group the most effective agent of social control?
**Possible answers for:**
- The peer group can exert a strong influence over socialization into identity by setting out what is normal for particular roles, e.g. gender roles.
- The peer group can give positive sanctions in the form of praise and compliments, for example in the workplace, and this can be a big motivator for continued conformity to group norms and values.
- People feel they need to belong in groups and so the kind of social control exerted by peers, such as the threat of being rejected, is powerful.
- The peer group can use negative peer pressure to ensure individuals conform to group norms and this can be very powerful e.g. ostracism.
- The peer group can use sarcasm, ridicule, shame, and criticism in an attempt to control individuals.
- For many youth peers are a more powerful socializing agent than families or education e.g. the peer control that takes place in anti-school subcultures.
- Youth spend a great deal of time with peers, for example in school, and hence their impact is magnified.
- Any other reasonable response.
**Against:**
- The effect of peers is negligible compared to the family – as Oakley shows it is the family that sets the agenda for gender identity, for example, through canalization, manipulation, etc.
- Education has a more profound influence in socializing the young through the hidden curriculum which is reinforced by positive and negative sanctions.
- For some people, religion is the most powerful socializing agent as it is also promoted by the family and in some societies, by schools and the media too – it can shape the core norms and values that individuals believe in and live by.
- Formal social control is more effective, police have the power to apply severe sanctions that restrict right and liberty.
- Postmodernists may argue that we live in a media-saturated world and that the media – particularly the internet – is now more powerful in terms of the way it shapes attitudes, opinions, and identities.
- Functionalists would argue that all of the agents of socialization must work together to ensure that successful socialization takes place so to pinpoint one as more effective than another is incorrect.
- The workplace is a more powerful agent of socialization e.g. the social controls exercised by pay and promotion and the threat of being fired/sacked is significant.
- Any other reasonable response.