Evaluate the view that an individual’s identity is largely shaped by their social class.
CAMBRIDGE
A level and AS level
2021
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the concept of social class and its impact on identity. State your stance on the essay question.
Arguments Supporting Class Shaping Identity
Objective Differences: Highlight differences in socialisation, attitudes, and values across class groups. Provide evidence from BSA, Savage, and link to objective social class differences (work, income, life chances).
Structural Influence: Discuss how class structures impact life chances and persist despite social mobility. Mention Savage's observation of people recognizing class as a 'structural force'.
Arguments Against Class as the Primary Shaper of Identity
Fragmentation of Class Identity: Present evidence of blurring class boundaries due to social changes (e.g., work, migration). Reference the “We're all middle class now” perspective.
Rise of Individualism: Discuss the shift towards consumption, leisure, and lifestyle as key markers of identity. Cite Pakulski and Clarke and Saunders to support the idea of class as outdated and deterministic.
Alternative Influences: Briefly mention other significant factors shaping identity, such as gender, ethnicity, and argue for their relative importance.
Evaluation and Conclusion
Analyze both sides of the argument. Acknowledge the historical significance of class while considering its evolving role in shaping identity. Emphasize the interplay between objective structural forces and subjective experiences in shaping individual identities. Conclude with your final stance on the essay question.
To what extent is an individual’s identity shaped by their social class?
Social class, a hierarchical system based on economic resources, social status, and cultural capital, has long been considered a significant factor in shaping individual identity. This essay will evaluate the extent to which social class influences identity, considering both arguments supporting and challenging this view.
Arguments supporting the influence of social class on identity:
Proponents of this perspective argue that social class significantly shapes an individual's identity through various mechanisms. Firstly, different social classes experience distinct socialization processes, leading to diverse social characteristics. For instance, children from working-class backgrounds are often raised with an emphasis on obedience and conformity, preparing them for manual labor, while middle-class children are encouraged to be creative and independent, aligning with professional careers.
Secondly, social class exerts a critical influence on attitudes and values. The British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA) consistently reveals class-based differences in political views, with working-class individuals generally supporting left-leaning parties and middle-class individuals leaning towards right-leaning parties. This suggests that class position can shape political ideologies. Similarly, class differences are apparent in educational aspirations, cultural consumption patterns, and even leisure activities. For example, Savage's work (2015) highlights how individuals, even those who reject class labels, recognize the "structural" force of class in their own lives and the lives of others, influencing their choices and opportunities.
Moreover, sociologists emphasize the objective differences between class groups related to work and income. These disparities result in unequal life chances, impacting individuals' access to healthcare, education, and housing. Consequently, class membership becomes a significant determinant of an individual's life trajectory and shapes their sense of self.
Arguments challenging the influence of social class on identity:
Conversely, critics argue that the link between social class and identity has weakened in contemporary society. They point to the fragmentation or even disappearance of traditional class identities. Social changes, particularly in work and migration patterns, have led to a blurring of class boundaries.
The rise of the knowledge economy and the decline of traditional industries have created more diverse occupational structures, making it difficult to categorize individuals into rigid class categories. This has led some to argue, often in popular discourse, that "we're all middle class now," suggesting a decline in the salience of class as a marker of identity.
Additionally, critics argue that focusing solely on class as a determinant of identity is deterministic and ignores the individual's agency in shaping their own lives. They contend that identity is increasingly fluid and chosen rather than ascribed. Consumption patterns, leisure activities, and lifestyle choices, they argue, are more significant in shaping contemporary identities. For instance, Pakulski and Waters (1996) argue for the emergence of "decentred identities" where individuals construct their sense of self through various sources beyond class, such as gender, ethnicity, and personal interests.
Conclusion:
While the influence of social class on identity has undeniably diminished in contemporary society, it would be premature to disregard its relevance entirely. While traditional class structures may have weakened, class remains a significant force shaping opportunities, aspirations, and life chances. Individuals may have more freedom to construct their identities today, but they do so within a social context where class continues to exert influence, albeit in more nuanced and complex ways. A comprehensive understanding of identity formation requires acknowledging the interplay of social class with other social categories like gender, ethnicity, and sexuality.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
Evaluate the view that an individual’s identity is largely shaped by their social class.
In support of the view:
- Evidence of diverse social characteristics between class groups, which can be linked to different socialisation experiences for each.
- Social class is a critical influence on attitudes and values, e.g. education, politics (voting), workplace, peer groups, cultural consumption etc.
- Survey evidence suggests that people explain themselves in class terms.
- Many sociologists point to objective differences between class groups linked to work and income.
- Structural differences persist, i.e. life chances still class-based.
- Even those rejecting class labels recognize that class is an important ‘structural’ force in theirs and other people’s lives (Savage).
Against the view:
- Evidence suggests that (class) identity has fragmented, if not disappeared.
- Social changes, especially in relation to work and migration, have led to a blurring of boundaries with identity becoming much more individualistic – ‘we're all middle class now.’
- Class is viewed as a dated and overdeterministic concept.
- Identity is now linked to consumption, leisure, and lifestyle choices.
- This is a subjective view.
- An alternative approach would be to compare the relative importance of class to other sources of identity, e.g. gender, ethnicity, etc.
Research evidence:
- British Social Attitudes Survey (BSA)
- Savage
- Pakulski
- Clarke and Saunders
Additional concepts:
- Objective, subjective, life chances, centred identities
- Decentred identities; oversocialized, deterministic
The above content is indicative and other relevant approaches to the question should be rewarded appropriately.