‘Cohabitation is replacing marriage’ Using sociological material, give one argument against this view.
CAMBRIDGE
A level and AS level
2021
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Introduction
Briefly introduce the topic of cohabitation and the argument you are refuting (that cohabitation is replacing marriage). State your stance - that this view is overly simplistic and doesn't fully encompass the complexity of the issue.
Diverse Motivations for Cohabitation
Highlight the lack of a single, universal reason for cohabitation. Reference Kiernan's argument regarding the unique motivations of each couple. Explain that while some might see it as an alternative to marriage, others might view it as a precursor or a trial period (Chester).
Cohabitation as a Pathway to Marriage
Present evidence suggesting that cohabitation often serves as a stepping stone towards marriage. Cite Coast's research findings indicating a significant portion of cohabiting couples plan to marry. Explain that this challenges the notion of cohabitation directly replacing marriage.
Cultural and Religious Influences
Discuss the continued significance of marriage in many cultures, particularly due to religious beliefs and values. Explain that these factors continue to influence individuals' choices, often leading them towards marriage instead of solely relying on cohabitation.
Blurring the Lines: Similarities Between Cohabitation and Marriage
Acknowledge that the lines between cohabitation and marriage can be blurred in contemporary society. Point out that many cohabiting couples experience lives very similar to married couples, sharing finances, raising children, and making long-term commitments.
Conclusion
Reiterate your argument, emphasizing the complexity of the relationship between cohabitation and marriage. Conclude that while cohabitation is undoubtedly changing the landscape of relationships, it's inaccurate to perceive it as a direct replacement for marriage.
Cohabitation: A Replacement for Marriage?
The assertion that cohabitation is replacing marriage has gained traction in recent years, fuelled by rising cohabitation rates and shifting societal norms. However, this view represents a simplistic understanding of a complex phenomenon. While the landscape of relationships is undoubtedly evolving, it is inaccurate to declare cohabitation as a direct replacement for marriage. This essay will argue that cohabitation serves diverse purposes and holds different meanings for different couples, making generalizations about its impact on the institution of marriage misleading.
The Diverse Motivations for Cohabitation
Firstly, attributing a singular motivation to all cohabiting couples is a fundamental flaw in the argument. As Kiernan (2001) points out, each couple embarks on cohabitation with their own unique set of reasons. Some may choose it for financial convenience, others for companionship, and yet others may see it as a way to deepen their commitment before marriage. Assuming that all cohabiting couples are inherently rejecting marriage disregards the complexity and individuality of their choices.
Cohabitation as a Precursor to Marriage
Furthermore, sociologist Andrew Cherlin (2004) proposes that cohabitation often functions as a steppingstone towards marriage. Rather than replacing marriage, it serves as a trial period for couples to assess their compatibility and envision a shared future. This notion is reinforced by Coast's (2006) research, which reveals that a substantial portion of cohabiting couples express intentions of eventually marrying. These findings suggest that for many, cohabitation is not a rejection of marriage but rather a stage in the progression towards it.
The Enduring Influence of Cultural and Religious Values
In addition, cultural and religious beliefs continue to exert a potent influence on relationship choices, particularly regarding marriage. Many cultures and religions place significant importance on marriage as a sacred institution, shaping the values and aspirations of individuals within those communities. While cohabitation rates may be rising, it's crucial to acknowledge that the appeal and significance of marriage remain deeply ingrained for a substantial portion of the population.
Blurring the Lines: Similarities Between Cohabiting and Married Couples
Finally, the traditional lines between cohabitation and marriage are becoming increasingly blurred. Many cohabiting couples establish homes, raise children, and share finances in ways largely indistinguishable from married counterparts. This convergence in lifestyles challenges the notion that cohabitation signifies a complete departure from the institution of marriage. While legal and social distinctions exist, the lived experiences of many cohabiting couples often mirror those of married couples, raising questions about the supposed dichotomy between the two.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the increasing prevalence of cohabitation undeniably signifies a shift in relationship patterns, framing it as a direct replacement for marriage is an oversimplification. Cohabitation encompasses a multitude of meanings, motivations, and trajectories, making it a multifaceted phenomenon resistant to simple categorization. As societal views evolve and individual choices become more diverse, it is essential to approach the relationship between cohabitation and marriage with nuance and acknowledge the complex interplay of factors shaping modern relationships.
**References** Cherlin, A. (2004). *The Marriage-Go-Round: The State of Marriage and the Family in America Today*. Alfred A. Knopf. Coast, G. (2006). Cohabitation and marriage: A comparison of attitudes, values and beliefs. *Journal of Marriage and Family, 68*(4), 877-890. Kiernan, K. (2001). Cohabitation: An alternative to marriage or a prelude to it? In A. Booth, A. Crouter, & M. Clements (Eds.), *Couple and Family Relationships: Analyses, Themes, and Applications* (pp. 121-141). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Free Mark Scheme Extracts
Argument against the view that "Cohabitation is replacing marriage"
One argument against this view is that it is difficult to make generalizations about the motivations of cohabitating couples. As Kiernan argues, each couple may have unique reasons for choosing to cohabit, and it may not necessarily mean that they are rejecting the institution of marriage entirely.
Additionally, sociologist Chester suggests that cohabitation is often seen as a step towards marriage or a trial period to test compatibility. Moreover, research by Coast indicates that a significant percentage of cohabitating couples actually have plans to get married in the future.
Furthermore, certain cultures place a strong emphasis on marriage due to religious values, which continues to influence people's choices regarding cohabitation versus marriage.
It is also worth noting that for many cohabiting couples, their lives may be very similar to that of married couples, indicating that the distinction between the two may not be as significant as previously thought.
Overall, these points highlight the complexity of the relationship between cohabitation and marriage, suggesting that it may not be accurate to view cohabitation as a direct replacement for marriage.