Discuss how far sociologists would agree that changes in the law are the main reason for the pattern of divorce in Britain since 1969.
AQA
GCSE
2024
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Essay Plan: How Far Do Sociologists Agree That Changes in the Law are the Main Reason for the Pattern of Divorce in Britain Since 1969?
Introduction:
- Briefly outline the significant increase in divorce rates in Britain since 1969.
- State the essay's purpose: to assess the extent to which changes in the law are considered the primary driver of this trend by sociologists.
Arguments Supporting the Importance of Legal Changes:
1. The Divorce Reform Act 1969:
- Explain the key changes introduced by the Act (e.g., no-fault divorce, wider grounds for divorce).
- Provide evidence of the immediate impact of the Act on divorce rates.
- Reference sociologists who argue that the Act led to a "culture of divorce" or made divorce more socially acceptable (e.g., Ronald Fletcher).
2. Subsequent Legal Changes:
- Briefly mention other legal reforms that made divorce more accessible (e.g., changes to legal aid, reduction in the separation period).
- Explain how these reinforced the impact of the 1969 Act.
Arguments Emphasizing Other Factors:
1. Changing Social Attitudes:
- Discuss the decline in stigma associated with divorce since the 1960s.
- Link this to broader social changes like secularization, rising individualism, and the women's liberation movement.
- Reference sociologists like Anthony Giddens who emphasize the shift towards "confluent love" and the search for personal fulfillment in relationships.
2. Economic Factors:
- Explain how women's increased economic independence (e.g., due to increased participation in the workforce) has made it easier for them to leave unhappy marriages.
- Discuss the impact of economic pressures on marriage, such as unemployment or the rising cost of living.
3. Changing Expectations of Marriage:
- Argue that people now have higher expectations of marriage in terms of personal fulfillment and companionship.
- Link this to the "ideology of romantic love" and the idea of marriage as a partnership of equals.
Evaluation and Conclusion:
- Summarize both sides of the argument.
- Present a balanced conclusion, acknowledging the importance of legal changes while emphasizing the interplay of multiple factors.
- Argue that while legal changes made divorce more accessible, they were likely a response to, as well as a driver of, broader social and cultural shifts.
- Suggest that the relationship between law and social change is complex and that attributing the pattern of divorce solely to legal changes would be a simplistic view.
How Far Do Sociologists Agree That Changes in the Law are the Main Reason for the Pattern of Divorce in Britain Since 1969?
The sharp rise in divorce rates following the introduction of the Divorce Reform Act in 1969 suggests a strong correlation between legal changes and marital breakdown. However, sociologists argue that focusing solely on law as the primary driver of divorce oversimplifies a complex social phenomenon. This essay will examine the extent to which changes in the law, alongside other factors like secularisation, changing gender roles, and economic factors, explain the pattern of divorce in Britain since 1969.
The Impact of Legal Changes
The Divorce Reform Act 1969 and subsequent legislation, like the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, undoubtedly played a significant role in increasing divorce rates. By making divorce more accessible and removing the requirement to prove fault, these legal changes reduced the social stigma associated with divorce and provided a viable legal solution for unhappy marriages. The introduction of "no-fault" divorce, in particular, removed a significant barrier, leading to a spike in divorces immediately after 1969. This suggests that the law can indeed act as a catalyst for change in social behaviour.
Beyond Legal Reform: The Influence of Social Change
While legal changes facilitated divorce, attributing the divorce pattern solely to legal reform would be reductionist. Sociologists argue that wider societal shifts played an equally, if not more, important role. Secularisation, the decline in religious influence, weakened the traditional view of marriage as a sacred, lifelong commitment. This, coupled with rising individualism, led to a greater emphasis on personal happiness and self-fulfilment within marriage, increasing the likelihood of divorce when these needs were unmet.
Furthermore, the transformation of gender roles and expectations from the 1970s onwards significantly impacted marital relationships. Increased female participation in the workforce provided women with economic independence, making it easier for them to leave unhappy marriages. The dual burden of paid work and domestic responsibilities also increased marital strain, contributing to divorce rates. Feminist sociologists argue that this highlights how changes in the law, while seemingly gender-neutral, can have a differential impact on men and women.
Economic Factors and Divorce
Economic factors also intersect with divorce patterns. While some argue that economic hardship and associated stress can lead to marital breakdown, others suggest that the financial ability to divorce is crucial. The rise in dual-income households has made it financially viable for couples to divorce, as they are less reliant on a single income. Conversely, financial struggles can trap couples in unhappy marriages due to the costs associated with separation and legal proceedings. This demonstrates the complex interplay between economic realities and divorce patterns.
Conclusion
While changes in the law, particularly the Divorce Reform Act 1969, undeniably contributed to the increase in divorce rates in Britain, it is crucial to recognise the multifaceted nature of this social phenomenon. Sociologists argue that wider social changes, including secularisation, evolving gender roles, and economic factors, have been equally, if not more, influential. The legal framework provides the mechanism for divorce, but it is the interplay of these broader social forces that shapes individuals' decisions and experiences within marriage and ultimately contributes to the complex pattern of divorce observed in Britain since 1969.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
Excellent
Detailed knowledge and understanding of relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods presented in a well-developed answer. A wide range of specialist terms used with precision.
Sustained application of relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods to the issues raised by the question. Few if any inaccuracies or omissions.
Developed critical analysis and evaluation of relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods. Well-constructed arguments with supported judgements and evidence-based conclusions.
Very Good
Good evidence of relevant knowledge and understanding of theories, concepts, evidence and methods but elements lacking detail and development. A good range of specialist terms used appropriately.
Good application of relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods to the issues raised by the question. Some inaccuracies or omissions.
Good evidence of analysis and evaluation of the relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods. A logical argument, but judgements and conclusions may be indistinct and/or lacking in appropriate development.
Good
Limited evidence of relevant knowledge and understanding of theories, concepts, evidence and methods. A limited range of specialist terms used appropriately.
Limited application of relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods to the issues raised by the question. Significant inaccuracies or omissions.
Limited attempt at analysis and evaluation of the relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods but lacking in appropriate development. There may be inconsistencies in the argument made and reasoning may be inaccurate leading to false or contradictory judgements and conclusions.
Fair
Fragments of basic knowledge and understanding of theories, concepts, evidence and methods relevant to the topic. Specialist terms generally used inappropriately if at all.
Little or no application of relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods to the issues raised by the question.
Little or no analysis of the relevant theories, concepts, evidence and methods, assertion rather than evaluation, poorly-constructed argument with little or no evidence of substantiated judgements and only cursory conclusions.
Poor
Nothing worthy of credit.