Identify and explain one disadvantage of using a snowball sample to investigate attitudes of students towards higher education.
AQA
GCSE
2021
👑Complete Model Essay
Free Essay Plan
Snowball Sampling and its Disadvantages in Investigating Student Attitudes Towards Higher Education
Introduction: Define snowball sampling and briefly explain its uses in sociological research. Mention its particular relevance in studying hard-to-reach populations. However, emphasize that this essay will focus on a key disadvantage of snowball sampling, particularly when investigating student attitudes towards higher education.
Sample Bias: A Significant Disadvantage
Explanation of Sample Bias: Define sample bias and explain how it occurs in snowball sampling. Emphasize the chain-referral nature of the method, where existing subjects recruit further participants from their own social networks. Highlight that this process leads to a clustering of individuals with similar characteristics and viewpoints.
Application to Student Attitudes: Explain how sample bias can skew results in a study about student attitudes toward higher education. Give specific examples:
- Socioeconomic Background: Students from similar socioeconomic backgrounds might hold similar views on higher education, influenced by factors like family history and financial resources. Snowball sampling within such a group could overrepresent these views, neglecting the perspectives of students from diverse backgrounds.
- Academic Performance: High-achieving students might be more likely to know others who are also academically inclined, leading to a sample biased towards positive attitudes about higher education. Conversely, a snowball sample starting with students struggling academically might overrepresent negative or ambivalent views.
Consequences of Sample Bias
Limited Generalizability: Explain that a biased sample undermines the study's generalizability. The findings cannot be reliably extrapolated to the wider student population, limiting the research's usefulness in understanding broader trends and informing policy decisions.
Reinforcement of Existing Biases: Discuss how snowball sampling can inadvertently reinforce existing societal biases. If the initial participants hold prejudiced views about certain educational pathways, these biases could be perpetuated through the referral process, further skewing the results.
Conclusion
Concisely summarize the main argument, reiterating that while snowball sampling has its uses, sample bias is a significant disadvantage, particularly in research exploring student attitudes towards higher education. The chain-referral nature of this sampling method can lead to an unrepresentative sample, limiting the generalizability of findings and potentially reinforcing existing biases. Emphasize the importance of acknowledging this limitation and considering alternative sampling methods to ensure a more accurate representation of student perspectives.
Disadvantages of Snowball Sampling in Investigating Student Attitudes Towards Higher Education
Snowball sampling, while useful in certain research contexts, presents a significant disadvantage when investigating student attitudes towards higher education: sample bias. This essay will delve into the nature of snowball sampling, elaborate on the issue of sample bias, and explain why it poses a challenge to the validity of research findings.
Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling technique where initial participants recruit further participants from their own social networks. This method is particularly useful for accessing hard-to-reach populations where a sampling frame is unavailable. However, this reliance on participants recruiting similar individuals introduces a significant risk of bias.
Sample bias occurs when the sample selected for a study is not representative of the population it intends to generalize to. In the case of snowball sampling, participants are likely to recruit individuals who are similar to themselves in terms of demographics, experiences, and – most importantly in this context – attitudes. This leads to a self-selected sample where individuals with particular viewpoints are over-represented, while others are excluded.
When investigating student attitudes towards higher education, using a snowball sample might result in a group heavily skewed towards a specific demographic or perspective. For instance, if the initial participant has a very positive outlook on higher education and actively encourages their friends with similar views to participate, the resulting sample will not accurately reflect the diversity of opinions within the student population. This over-representation of a particular viewpoint undermines the generalizability of the research findings. The study may conclude that students hold overwhelmingly positive attitudes towards higher education, while in reality, this only reflects the views of a select and unrepresentative group.
In conclusion, while snowball sampling can be a valuable tool for accessing certain populations, its reliance on participant-driven recruitment creates significant sample bias. This bias is particularly problematic when investigating student attitudes towards higher education, as it can lead to an inaccurate representation of the diverse range of perspectives within the student body. Researchers must carefully consider the potential for bias and explore alternative sampling methods when seeking to generalize findings to the wider student population.
Free Mark Scheme Extracts
Self-Selecting
Sample Bias
Non-Probability Sampling
• A self-selected sample relies on volunteers recommending other volunteers, therefore the sample might not be representative of the population as a whole.
• Sample bias – participants recruit other participants and this may lead to a biased sample as subjects are likely to recruit their friends who are likely to have similar attitudes.
• Non-probability sample, which may be unrepresentative of the population, eg over-representing the views of middle-class males.